Will the Australian M1A2 SEPv3 go to the British tech tree?

You’re delusional, you literally did not mention nor responded to any of my questions about where the mythical Armour that you’re the only one that you see in the Abrams.

You ignore anything that i say about the Abrams weakspots, then 5 min later you ask what are they, how is this not trolling?

You’re mixing up armor with survivability.

1 Like

Whats the difference?

Both will be OHK if hit basically anyhwere, but the Ariete doesnt even really have the turret cheek protection. Which is why its weaker.

Ariete has basically no armor which makes it a tank with probably the worst armor in the game.
It also has ammo scattered all over the vehicle, so it’s survivability is also next to zero.

That tank pretty much gets 0 points when looking at defensive features. Challengers are solid 3s.

The ariete moves quicker than a challenger so it gets a plus point there, out of all the top tiers i have i would say the chally’s are at the bottom of the pile i’m just playing them currently so i can try and get the vickers mk7 unlocked before the TT changes.

1 Like

Smaller profile too if im not mistaken, which helps it be a sneaky sniper and whilst it’s gun doesnt allow for the same performance of DM53 as the Leopard 2A7. 5 second reload DM53 makes it a powerful glasscanon.

Yeah im doing exactly the same at the moment.

1 Like

off topic but i wrote my message at 3am and i just noticed my horrific grammar errors XD.

1 Like

Fair, I wouldnt exactly recommend going on the “everyone tells at eachother” forum that late

Oh i see many of you didnt play CR2 or just lying saying that CR2 is good mbt, there is simple answer. No its not good mbt on top tier. No armor, very bad shell, the worst mobility so abrams would be the best mbt in UK tech tree. So +1 to the UK tech tree.

1 Like

I don’t think an Aussie version should be added. Unlike the aim our SEP 3 is completely off the shelf.

UK should finally receive something competitive, even if it isn’t domestic.

1 Like

Or they could just fix the 50 or so outstanding bug reports for the Challenger 2s and make them competitive. Especially if they started using reload rates as a balancing feature again

Main buffs would be:

  • Expand the ready rack to 20-28 rounds or lower the replenishment rate from 20 seconds per round to 4-5 seconds per round
  • Increase engine HP to 1300 ish (yes this is an actual bug report)
  • Add the missing spall liners
  • Buff L27A1 (Yes there is a valid report for this too, small buff, but buff nonetheless)
  • ERA is about 1/4 its IRL performance
  • The Mantlet has a literal hole in it, as they refuse to model parts of it
  • Armour is pretty much universally underperforming

There are also other things to add flavour to the CR2s, like the fact they could all get dozer blades.

and then there is always the Challenger 3(P)

3 Likes

Challengers can’t never get competitive, as they aren’t in real life.

It should go to Britain since AU & CA are the closest commonwealth nations to Britain and the addition of India was a mistake which I think we can all unanimously agree with

Britain’s best tank should not be a foreign one. They have no claim on the Abrams and it shouldn’t be touching the British tree ever.

It might be a hard pill to swallow but it’s better than nothing. Sub TTs are a thing and France and Italy already went with the route of foreign vehicles being their best.

Buddy we are getting it

And we are gonna give it the win rate it deserves

1 Like

Good luck suffering from the huge exposed turret ring and the basket.

it is fine with me

Why would it go to the British? The M1A1 is in the U.S tree