Sources like that are about as annoying as they can be, especially with others like Zaloga downright making up random shit.
Dual band IR with a variable FOV.
Never said it wasn’t.
No, I’m not. I’m thinking that the T-90A is a glorified T-90.
That’s… Also exactly what I had said, almost verbatim. You even quoted it.
What part are you confused about?
So it has basically the same IRCCM of the in game R-73?
LOL yes!
Pretty much. In-game there is no difference between dual band seekers and basic IR seekers, I believe.
F-15C, M1A2 SEP2, etc.
R-77 has a maximum kinematic range of 80km.
Unless you mean to tell me the R-77 only has a range of 20km…
for the same reason that Germany is stuck with a Phantom for a while
Russian and chinese equipment would be irrelevant to top tier
bad choice of words on my part sorry, should have said “practice” not “reality”, but a new player just looking at the cards might gleam this.
Showing up to the military tech demo and wondering why everyone wants to buy the newest off the line F-16C instead of the MiG-29SMT that’s actually a MiG-29A that has been modernized 14 times
2 Likes
China would at least compete (in the air), especially if the PL-12s gets its shackles (nerfs) off. That thing is like AIM-120C equivalent more or less. And they have fairly good radars (iirc) so it wouldn’t be that much of a stretch.
1 Like
I see. Ignore what I said then, since I had been responding on the basis of a misinterpretation xD
Weapons integration and cost, for the most part.
120C-5 equivalent is the PL-12B, not the current PL-12.
1 Like
J10 is a 2004 plane
if were introducing planes by time this would’ve come before the Su-27SM which is a 2006 plane
at the same time Tranche 1 Typhoons were guarding the skies of Italy, UK and Germany with AiM-9Li-1 and AiM-120C
imagine J10, with twice as much thrust, more agile, more missiles and a better radar
the Su would be utterly irrelevant and the J would at best be a side note in every match
1 Like
and I proved him wrong.
3 Likes
I feel the Su-30MKK would be another nice plane to ease into further aircraft
No you didn’t
think you missed this
You claimed that the F-15, M1A2 SEPV2 and AH-64D all used wepaon from this Centuary. Not a single one of them does
In fact, all 3 use weapon systems from the early 1990s if not earlier. The only weapon system you mentioned is the AGR-20 which is newer. Though comparing AGR-20 with KH-38s for example, is a stupid comparison as they have a fraction of the range and firepower.
Considering most nations top tier AGM is actually the AGM-65 that entered service in the 70s (and upgraded in the 80s) and yet the Soviets have an AGM from 2012 kinda shows what OP is complaining about and the fact that NATO cannot get its weapon system from 2012 or newer because the soviets would be totally outclassed. Like imagine Brimstone 2 with its 60km range, Full FnF abilitiy including mmV seeker and the ability for most aircraft to carry at least 12, if not 18.
6 Likes