Why only small or restricted maps?

Adding a “switch” to choose only large/small/all should be a fast and easy fix. Same way they did with night battles

1 Like

I dont know if this is actually real (I hope not) but anyway the small version of Holland is genuinely the single worst map they ever added to this game.

Im sorry but when every single game ends with literally 20-30 dead tanks all in one single map square, no one can tell me with a straight face that the map has been designed well.

The only reason I havent banned it is because Seversk is my permanent ban due to the fact that if its not banned 5 out of every 10 games I ever play are on seversk (which is a whole different thing to complain about).

3 Likes

This picture is doctored lol

I don’t think its as straightforward as the majority ‘preferring’ small maps, I thinks it’s just that they expect small maps.

Most people don’t actually know what they like, If there was more positive exposure to SIM ground I wouldn’t be surprised if players would begin shifting towards it

1 Like

No most people prefer it. This is just speculation trying to force your viewpoint.

Mr pom pom you sure you didn’t pull another ad populum? low tier to mid tier where most things don’t have a range finder your statement might be true, but this is simply not true for 10.0+, you can start a poll to see how many likes corridor maps and be specific about vehicle rank because it heavily influences how one plays their vehicle to enjoy.

2 Likes

I’m getting fed up with small maps at top tier, Every poll I’ve seen has larger maps in favor by 80% yet they refuse to address it. But I’m not surprised

1 Like

Seeing as you have presented nothing to support you claim and therefor:

“This is just speculation trying to force your viewpoint”

Man this is way easier than actually having a discussion and listening to people.

1 Like

I personally base my preference for larger maps on my sim experience.

With more breathing room for tanks to spread out and less visual clutter, I find more success in using all of the available map and terrain. In GRB it seems like players flock to ‘meta’ positions on the map

This map for example is very nice but rare to play

#Full Fulda Needed

I loved that map

Its just sad that gaijin doesnt listen to the community when it comes to stuff thats not REDFOR related.

Then we would have finally gotten good maps, instead of close range maps that Russian tanks excel on due to their Fake Russian Fantasy ERA.

1 Like

I have, many times in threads like this which are remade by bad players almost daily, which you clearly have not read. But thats not convenient for the average forum users narrative.

I think it has a ton of potential to be incredibly good if designed right. The old large version was kinda bad, but ut could be a lot better.

They seem to mess up Chinese vehicles alot too, so that argument doesn’t hold a ton of water.

My own theory is just that it’s easier to get information for Russian vehicles, and that there are less conflicting sources. Plus Nato tanks can be very good in CQC too.

Only Germany, Sweden and Israël. But with the constant nerfing, i dont know for how long.

The current maps are all designed around Russian vehicles. CQC or flat long distance.
The only 3 good maps IMHO, are Pradesh, Red desert and Big Tunisia.
Also, big Mozdok was very good. All variants of big Mozdok.

1 Like