There is no point coming along to spread your own opinion, just do a bit more research before saying stuff like this.
Also no active conflict is involved on this forum.
1 Like
Worse ceilings for 95% of the player base simply don’t matter, the floor does. The average player has a negative K/D. So how easy something is to play massively influences win rates.
And there are blatant cases of Gaijin very much handing out ahistorical nerfs, and buffs as well as fudging numbers.
4 Likes
The problem is, the Russian cannons are a bit too accurate especially for their fire rate. Even worse for the BMPT which doesn’t shake the way it does IRL.
And what they did is, just copy that, rename it, change the model a bit, slap it onto NATO vehicles and call it a day. Oh and halve the reload rate. So 30mms and co on NATO tanks are basically the same gun the BMPT has in terms of accuracy and co, but with lowered fire rate.
Which means stuff like AHEAD suck even more, since you have way higher gun dispersion. Ignoring that the shell underperforms since it’s mean to be an upgrade to proxy used before but instead is more of a downgrade.
2 Likes
Bmp-2m has the same cannon and it shakes to the same degree.
Rusian cannons shouldn’t be able to hit a bus at 100 meters to be realistic.
They’re not “a bit too accurate” - they’re a space lazer compared to themselves irl.
1 Like
Yeah, the guns we have are too accurate for Russian ones with their fire rate, and not accurate enough for NATO ones. Sad state of things.
2 Likes
Yeah, but in theory that’s your issue not the tank.
If it’s an issue for the absolute majority of players, it’s a general issue. It’s like saying Aim Assist in games like CoD for console isn’t a problem because it only allows the bottom 50% of console players to have the same accuracy as the top 10% and makes even pro’s switch over.
Because in theory you could still perform better on PC. If you were super dedicated, experienced, skilled, and worked much harder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc8Y_FQQrDg - Bradley, M242 buchmaster
https://youtu.be/apH5-7F8UUU?si=ykWoucG3AqrRSb1E - M242, 1325 meters btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCwR_Zp7PRk - 2A72 cannon
https://youtu.be/NGCmRhRhW78?si=rDiUZ4vghT-1Z7Wr - 2A72
The old British guy from Bovington Tank Museum.
That’s not what the conversation is about.
Sure. But what can u do about it in a general balancing sense? are u gonna allow the 10% who are better to continue using those easily, or let the 90% do so? Gaijin can’t make that first choice. + the K/D isn’t like crazily in favour of Russian tanks RN, (BMPT except) so it’s fine where it is.
Simple, because Gaijin only look on fire rate. They just assume all auto cannon got same accurate, so they just ignore the real life “slow fire rate, high accurate” part
1 Like
As someone who’s played both. You alone on this one…
You makin too much sense.
As someone researching the M1 series and have M1A1AIM and owning the Leclercs, the Leclercs are better in my opinion in almost every aspect except firepower and armor.
1 Like
If you’re comparing the Heaviest Abrams to the lightest Leclerc? Sure. But the M1A2 vs Leclerc S1? The Leclerc loses.
Abrams: Survivability, Armor, Traverse Speed, Frontal Guidance Angles, Reverse Speed, Higher Bustle Rack Capacity.
Leclerc: Rearward Guidance Angle, Top Speed ?
Maybe you just like the Leclerc. But the Abrams is simply just more versatile… Tye Leclerc is heavily limited. It isn’t special now that many tanks get a 5 sec reload now (the MSC with its 6 sec reload getting beat by other MBTs even before 11.0). Maybe the Leclerc is more HE resistant? But that’s the only other extra thing I could think of. But peaking yang the Leclerc is a nightmare if they have some kinda knowledge at least.
2 Likes
It goes both ways
No, I know what happened. They hit the optics on the BV and made it blind. Then they hit the turret control and it went all disco.
Call it what you want, the 25mm killed that tank, mobility and unusable is still a kill. Even Russians who use that crap know its crap. Thier optics are like cheap foggy plexiglass, most arent even using thermal optics and even if they did they are multiple generations behind western versions.
Cope all you want…Ukraine is a parking lot of dead, burned out and busted Russian equipment you can stroll through
2 Likes
Look up vids on the BMPT firing…those 2 barrels dance like popped soda cans
1 Like
You clearly dont know what happened lol.
It was a T90M which was ambushed by TWO bradleys and FPV drones, first of all.
It was mission killed, yes, but it went on to drive off and the crew bailed before it got struck by more drones. The tank did its job and protected the crew.
Source? Russia had been using Western thermal (Thales ones), but they are making their own native thermals on par with NATO ones.
And Ukrainian, and NATO equipment.
2 Likes