I am quite grateful for the F-105 and F-4C moving to 10.0 though
I think 105D could go down to 9.7 but at least it doesn’t have to compete with tornadoes for base bombijg anymore
J-7D is really just stomping like you said
I am quite grateful for the F-105 and F-4C moving to 10.0 though
I think 105D could go down to 9.7 but at least it doesn’t have to compete with tornadoes for base bombijg anymore
J-7D is really just stomping like you said
That’s the issue, if you have checked the plan topic, you can find the comments that were liked over 20 by other players, most of them didn’t show up in the final result.(I have suggested the R2Y2 back to 7.7-7.3, but seems not)
Of course, some of them might be considered, like F14A(Iran) or f4c, but it doesn’t prove that all of the comments were seriously considered, especially for those low-tier vehicles
The reads with a bit of entitlement. I know what you mean when you say reasonable, basically if its a fair suggestion it should be implemented.
To be a bit semantic and focus on the word reasonable.
Gaijin needs incentive before the effect a change. Game developers aren’t staffed and run like a retail outlet where you have a bunch of people sitting around waiting for shit to do.
Each additional vehicle, feature, change, revision are all elements that need a good proposal to be considered and a strong incentive to be actioned.
A reasonable suggestion is worth discussing in the forums but by no means justifies an action. I mean lets use roads as an example, and discuss a bit of asset management.
Players complaining about a vehicle BR in war thunder is basically the same as complaining to your city council about a pot hole in your culdesac. The issue seems like a big deal because it affects you and the people in your street, and you’s all have to look it and drive around it, and its slowly vetting worse each time it rains. When in reality its a tiny issue that affects a very limited number of people and doesn’t warrant a special intervention and can wait to be addressed in routine maintenance.
Popularity of idea does not mean it’s a good idea.
The idea of a small number of people is not convincing.
At least they need to answer why it is good or why it was rejected, if keep silent, they look like arrogant and no respect for players suggestions
War Thunder isn’t a community mod for Fallout New Vegas, the development isn’t a collaborative process. There are specific occasions where player feedback is requested and when the community members make suggestions in accordance with the guidelines set out, there is a review and feedback process.
Most of the BR changes I see people referring to are made here in the General Discussion section of the Forums, not in the ‘Suggestion’ section of the forums. Here in general discussion, there’s little to no framework or guidelines for the formulation of a thread. In the suggestions section of the forum, threads aren’t published until they’re reviewed and determined to have met the minimum requirements in terms of content and formatting.
The topics discussed here might as well be drunken scribbles on a napkin.
No, I am talking about this topic
And it requires players follow the rules( but some of the players ignore that), basically, it asks players for suggestions and sends to developers, unlike the general discussion.
The thing is that if they ask for it then why not give their feedback and consider a few popular one
like m26 for example, it doesnt belong in 6.7 or VIDAR being at 8.0 when it could even move up to 9.0 and be fine
or PZH2000 which is basically worse armor, better reload VIDAR and its 7.7
Ah yep, duly noted.
Still don’t think they owe us any explanation. Notification about a rejection is a courtesy not an obligation
If you have checked what they did before, you might not think about that, at least they will explain some vehicles BR change reasons to show that they are considering, unlike this time, no more change, just close the topics, now I pretty doubt that if there is necessary for such kind of topics, they can do what they want without players.
They must’ve overestimated guided munition for base bombing purposes. in ARB.
I heard there are some guys who use PGM for long-range base bombing.
:/
They must’ve freaked out when they noticed. "OMG! IT TOO OP! "
Hi