Why most of players BR suggestions are ignored?

Game Discussion General Discussion
22

R-24Rs are real good missiles but extremely hindered by the poor radar of the 23. Flying NOE they’ll almost never be able to get a good lock before your missile is already out. R-60Ms can be defeated by a single flare in head-on, not even cutting throttle or turning, they’ve got horrid flare resistance. Just make sure to break the head on by 2km!

Fair

Agreed hence 12.3. Of course first the F-16A and F-20 need returned to their correct BRs, and the F.3 shouldn’t move up alone but alongside the other strongest 12.0s and 12.3s and maybe we add in 12.7s.

23

Biggest thing holding back the F3 is the state of BOL and MP.

Remove MP and give the F3 irl performing BOL ans I’d happily take on F-16s

24

Because the reason of gaijin in asking for your suggestions is merely to make you feel like you can give a suggestion,🫠 much like those accepted issues.

1 Like
25

  1. Player’s BR suggestions are not ignored, part of them are implemented - you cried out the 13.0 BR for F14 for example

  2. Other part of players br suggestions are not implemented because they are unrasonable.

26

because most of the proposals are nonsense, based on “I only play this nation and I want it to win everything”
for example Object 279 on 8.7 or Falcon on 7.7

27

do you want the M26 higher?

28

they ignored the otomatic one even though it was highly rated, what are you surprised about

29

If you play below rank VI yo are second class player. Now wait another 6 months or even a year before Gaijin decided add new BR changes for mid/low ranks.

1 Like
30

1st class is CAS players, 2nd class being tank players, lower br outside top tier is probably 3rd class from the look of how things are prioritize lol

31

Nah, just top tier and his 60 euros MBT/CAS plane zone are the pretty boys of Gaijin.
Just lets compare Top Tier BR changes with over 100 hundred changes with this last BR changes with only 38 changes LOL.

1 Like
32

The only good thing that has happened outside of top tier for the past 4 years is the addition of the bushed tiger h1 and ostwind 2 lol

1 Like
33

I fully believe it is intentional what they are doing.

If they can move this many planes down they can just as easily move this many planes up and give up decompression.

They have a blatant lack of respect for the wishes of the players and genuinely do not care for our input.

1 Like
34

Well they do spend time on the game and that is why you now have the Auction.That is where they spend their time…on making cash. Chasing a couple of dots on a screen is the game,the same old game since WT started. The faulty BR system and the old maps never change but as long as people play then why bother? The players are their own worst enemy.

35

“Part of them”, just random choosing a little bit that looks reasonable, which are still hot and at high tier, WWII and early Cold War vehicles are almost ignored, even they are reasonable and got a lot of approval

36

We just need another set of BR changes within this month specifically for BRs below 10.0

And i mean actually proper set, not 5 random SPAAs here and there

1 Like
37

Are you an employee? Do you have internal documents that is evidence?
Cause all your post has here is conjecture.

1 Like
38

Could War Thunder scrap the BR system and group vehicles another way? Like if a tank goes up from 5.7 to 6 it seems a big deal but is it really? Gaijins issues are that every tank form 1BR to 11 has to be linked, so you can run 1BR in a top tier match but what if the separated the divisions? So we dont have the P47 vs Mig 15 or a tank with no NV vs those who have none.

It’s an analogy but the way I see it Gajin have long since out grown the BR system the same way the UK rail net work have out grown the narrow width of its Victorian track system.If we in the UK want 200mph trains like Japan then we have to start again wiht a wider gauge of track.
War Thunder is hemmed in by its BR system now and the cracks in the infrastructure cant be ignored.
I mean if flying a WW2 plane against a post war jet is fun or having no NV or Laser RF against a tank that does is a giggle then I’ll take it all back.
It’s just not working as far as I can see

39

Short answer: No, the BR system is the only way to have random battles.

Adding in a weapon restriction system for mission makers, or custom/server hosts would allow for better custom battles though.

Right now I’d say over 90% of vehicles uptiers don’t really matter cause worst case your team doesn’t have as many as the other team but skill can still win the day.
For the <10% of vehicles that get shafted, they get shafted hard.

Cause let’s take top jets right. AIM-120s vs a 12.3 F-16A using only AIM-9Ls.
Yes, the Typhoon will always win that engagement; but against other opponents in a 16v16 match? That’s still a lethal target, and you can do this in sim right now… but it’s not possible for random battles.

1 Like
40

I am with you on that. I cant see a way out of an old flawed system except a massive rework or reboot. Not wishing to be negative ,quite opposite but I think we are stuck with many of the things wrong with the game.
To offer some positive advice based on my in game experience and watching replays, knowing the enemies weak spots really can level up a BR deficit it an uptier. I have see good player win by a big margin in a full uptier in GRB. That is all I can offer,anything else is just vehicles going up and down perpetually over time.Pretty pointless.

41

Tried suggesting something once and never again

suggested that they let us customize the reward icon and text to make it smaller or move so it does not block the sight when shooting ground in air battle

but kept denying claiming more info is needed when there was text pic and even video

they want 10 pages of tex and the work done for them
never again they can shove it