I know I’m not saying otherwise
Theyre almost identical (I believe it’s 17.1 for ZTZ and 17.6 for T-64B). Also, I was wrong about the ZTZ96’s speed limit, it’s 57kmh (and if you really wanna be stupid close with the stat differences the ZTZ96 has about double the reverse speed of the T-64B)
The T-64B absorbs a lot of DM33s during matches.
Play the tanks yourself and see.
Very fun tank and slept on it so long myself.
One of the few tanks at it’s BR that you can play the «haha, W goes forward» playstyle and survive of you want
I was quite literally directly referring to that with the entire notion of how it’s unreliable in both cases to aim at upper front plates
Here’s an additional stat that’s being slept on tho. The ZTZ96 has up to 30°/s of turret rotation. Better than the T-64B’s 24°/s and better than the T-72s 20°/s
Y’all seem to forget what I said about thw armor as well. I didn’t say it was impenetrable from DM33 (w/o weakspot considerations) I said it was impenetrable from DM23 (w/o weakspot considerations). Which that level of penetration is a massive amount of what tanks have in the 8.3-9.0 range
You’re even wrong about your own comments.
1 Like
He just looks at the statcards, he have never played any of them
1 Like
These statements aren’t contradictory. What I was referring to with the T-64B and T-72 armor (somehow you forgot or didn’t read; not my problem) was how they are treated in regards to their armor DM33 can more reliably pen the T-72 than the T-64B but not necessarily by a dramatic amount as they’re both unreliable to penetrate with DM33. Subsequently most aim at weakspots regardless of the difference. Also is DM23 the same as DM33? Y’all seem to act as if it is
This was about the ZTZ96 remember? A vehicle neither you nor I have played. This tangent about the T-64B is a waste of time
I was wrong about this too (LMAO) it’s 17.8 for the ZTZ96 and 17 for the T-64B
You are tilting it quite a lot just to not get UFP and turret to be penned. But it would look more like this.
Against a much more likely round to be faced with. DM23 105mm
400mm pen 105mm HEAT rounds, a little more apparent.
Not really! I am using a front LOS perspective which, still, does not impact the protection analysis, since the “Consider vertical camera angle” is disabled to show a full head-on angle.
Well as you can see, I got very different results. Are you sure about this, I am 100% sure that I used a DM33 round rather than yours which looks like a DM23 105mm.
I used DM33 too! But with the “Consider vertical camera angle" option disabled, as to show a flat LOS shot.
In your case, from that angle, it simulates a very close range encounter or one where the shooter is in a slightly elevated position.
Was talking about T72 not T64
Also the strv-105 is a centurion, so it’s slow and you get no armor at all
1 Like
Lot of folk on here forget to mention the ZTZ96 also has a round better than 3bm42 at 9.3
LMAO thanks bro for the laugh
1 Like
Not gonna lie, its gonna be one of hte only 9.7s after this, and it is a phenomenal tank for 9.7 man.
the ZTZ96 as well is a great 9.3 tank.