Why is the T-64A same BR as the T-72A with very big differences? (RB)

It defintely is but people like to rush to top tier and choose the fastest path to get there and since the T-55AMD-1 was cheaper then the T-62M1 then people will perfer The T55 and back in the day when i ask people wether to grind the T-55 or the T-62 they told me that the T-62 is totally trash. so i went for the t55-amd

I do love the ‘brezhnev’s eyebrows’ on it.

Man, I’m jealous, how come you’re getting so many night battles? I seldom get night battles whilst uptiered to 10.3, wonder why

I am more jealous of people getting city maps or small jungle maps while i get a whole big god damn map that taking me forever to even reach the middle. Before i even reach you get killed by a CAS helicopter.

Yeah, you’re right. I have them enabled but rarely see them. Sweats cried about it too much.

Spawn BMP3/BMD4/BMP2/Missile Slingers in those instances. They also melt helicopters.

I love city maps, too, though. Ever since the closed beta WoT days in 2010, city maps have been my jam.

Most likely there isn’t enough people that want to play night battles, so I guess large chunk of the community are sweats.

1 Like

They’re going to need to decompressed every single thing. The T-64B is fine where it at. It got bunch of ERA made out of bricks literally absorbed shot like nothing.

T-64B is just busted lol I am not going to pretend that it sucks, its literally feels like a direct upgrade to their 9.3s

No offense but maybe you should try playing it a bit safer, maybe don’t wander into empty fields. Also, I’m jealous that you get so many big maps, i’m stuck in these tiny ones

Yeah it is awesome, but also actually pretty well balanced

The T-64A is smaller and a bit more resistant to Chemical attacks thanks to its Zontik armor. While it doesn’t have the LRF the T-72A gets, I find that the height difference and armor coverage/shape are more reliable. I love utilizing the T-64A over the T-72A, but both are great vehicles for their BR with great shells.

t64A is significantly better than the t72 IMO. It’s considerably more responsive

The armor of the T-64A in raw thickness is worse, but I don’t get penetrated much in its composite. Most people will aim for the Driver’s port or lower plate, even if they can penetrate my UFP, simply because it’s programmed into their brains.

maybe gaijin could change it to an 1981/1983 model instead of the 1971 would bring it much closer to the T-72A

NSVT HMG
smoke grenade laucnhers
improved turret armor (same as on the B model)
also looks like the 16mm metal plate on the UFP in the pic
would only be lacking the LRF

image

2 Likes

The T-64a better at city just hide behind buildings and hopefully they won’t hear the engine sound.

yes yes yes much better basically.

Why is the T-64A same BR as the T-72A
because gaijin hasnt moved T-72a to 10.3 yet

that will only happen when Gaijin decompressed it.

Not really an issue, honestly. Gun is easy to aim with great velocity. It’s not like it is some SPG.

Maybe, but better to take BMP/BMD for city maps, nuking people in their side with autocannon or melting them with ATGM. The trash reverse speed of T-72A and T-64A is really evident on city maps. It’s not like the 279 which can reverse its way out of trouble while taking hits left and right.

1 Like

I wonder what happend to those reverse gear on russian tanks… Back in coldwar and WW2 those tank have lot of reverse gears making possible escapes. I am looking foward for war thunder to add the t-84 which finaly have break the curse of Russian reverse speed.

1 Like