what on earth makes the T-72A 10.3 material to you?
Ru style vehicles with reverse gear already in-game if you don’t mind a little trade off for armor lol mbt2000 and onwards they are extremely mobile, same size and height and only now the size of lfp is three times bigger, turret cheek still strong and ufp can bounce top ammunitions. mbt2000 and Khalid still featuring -6 degree gun depression so you can play these guys hull down better than all the ru counterparts (except for T-90M which is also -6).
from what i understood its when they made the T-64 they had to make certain compromises to the design to fit everything within such a small tank like only giving it one reverse gear due to technological limitations, and all soviet MBTs developed after followed the same design principle. As for why its still an issue is simply down to the russian MOD being cheap and lazy since the tech is there now.
Also there has been talks/rumors from sources in the Russian MOD mentioning an T-90M2 "Ryvok-1 which aims to improve the reverse gear issue by using an gearbox reverser (same as on the T-84) although i wouldn’t take these claims to seriously until we get actual footage of it
1 Like
t-64A should stay in 9.3 , the t-72A should go in 9.7 and the t-64B sould go in 10.0
when gaijin decompressed the game.
1 Like
They would have to make a separation. The T-64B in the game is actually the T-64BV, which has a hull armor scheme similar to the T-80U. It would be interesting to put the T-64A in Br9.3, add the T-64B, which has the same hull armor as the T-64A but with an added 30mm plate, in Br9.7 along with the T72A, and then rename the T-64B that is in the game as BV, give it the standard Kontakt1 and put it in Br10.00.
1 Like
Probably won’t go anywhere because of its overall lack of winrate and player performance. It even has less winrate, kills per spawn, kills per death than the T-55AM-1, and the AM-1 is often operated by less experienced players who have purchased a premium tank. Gaijin typically balances by statistics.
1 Like
no
Since the AM got moved to 9.0 not anymore, T-64B is outperforming it in everything but winrate.
Fair, but really, nothing is speaking OP about the T-64B that would warrant an BR increase. Only BR change I want is to bring the Khrizantema down to 9.3 or even 9.0 so I can use it with my 9.0 or 9.3 line-up. Ground radar is cool, and you can do some silly helicopter snipes from far out, but it’s not worth .7 over an AFT09, or even .3 over the BMD4s.
Or well, they can also raise the Br on those three. I find it curious to use my 1970 Chieftain against a 2017 BMD4M.
Age of a vehicle is not a factor, you know that.
if the game was balance by when the vehicle was made it gonna be impossible to grind for some nations
Yeah, that’s why we have HEAT-FS vs WW2 tanks.
Is that supposed to be an issue? What you’re saying has no relevancy to this game. It’s about balance. No HEAT-FS is stopping WW2 vehicles like the T-26E5, KT, and others from kicking ass.
Well, I’m tired of killing Tigers 2 with the M4A3E8 and the T-34-85. The problem now would be the maps, if the maps don’t allow you to fight properly and you can only go forward, it’s normal that those tanks are very difficult to destroy.
lol All those BRs are already entirely decompressed.
@TheDudesRug Dude, no one baited you.
Your most played vehicle is also my most favorite Soviet tank.
@poopooo The Chieftain needs those free BMD frags to get spaded easier.
Never said it was my most played. 279 is my most played. The BMP3 is in my most played lineup, however. Anyway, I know you’re on the spectrum, so I try be nice, but back on the ignore list you go.
Edit:
Just so you know, we were discussing the 279 and that’s what i was referring to. Nice bait, though.
But even if they miss they’ll go through.
64A looks like a straight downgrade to 72A.
Most people know the t-64 family have weaker armor then the T-72 FAmily therefore there brain mostly programmed just shoot anywhere in the hull with APFSDS. Only in uptier though.