i posted the video, because i wanted to know if the video was suitable for bug reports, because i still dont know the criteria for bug reports. I also posted the video, because i want to know why you all removed the 2 extra crew in the first place.
2 Likes
I can tell you it propably isnt suitable for a bug report, it is no primary source, the documentary would be needed to be published on an offical bradley developer site or on a official military site. The video you posted was uploaded by a random user that found it on an archive site and those is not eliglble as a source since to much could have been tempered with
Can the screenshot be from a replay(even if you cant really see whats going on, if i provide my pov in clips)? I have plenty of clips but often forget to take a ss or just dont have the time to react to grab one
as long as the screenshot is done with the ingame tools should work yeah, if you wanna be sure just add the replay and time stamp on top of it
1 Like
Gaijin have stated they don’t considered government site’s reliable sources.
official bundeswehr website (german military) was used as sources plenty of times
1 Like
@jd_hog77
I think they mean primary source.
Using with another or more secondary sources is probably valid.
Two simple reports done in regards to the track/lock/search functions, will likely get to more of them done towards the end of the event.
Could i lend someones eyes to make sure they are up to scratch?
1, 2.
The ADAD is IR not optical. Supposed to detect fix wing aircraft out to 10km and helicopters out to 7-8km.
Here is the British armies description of the ADAD.
The ADAD’s infrared scanner and processor provide target detection and prioritisation, and the system automatically slews the weapon sight on to the target.
I’ve been meaning to report the fact the ADAD had a short locking cone for the slewing. It should slew the sight to any target detected by the ADAD.
I’ll check the reports over in the morning through.
3 Likes
Ahh I see what you’re saying, what I was trying to convey is that if a target can be seen in the gunner IR optics then it should have been seen by the ADADs IR too, perhaps I should go reword that.
Forwarded your reports.
2 Likes
The one thing that really annoys me is pilots being able to see 3 tiny darts flying at them and being able to dodge them like they shouldn’t be visible at all to the pilot
1 Like
I have another two I want to get done but other than these can we think of anything else than can be easily reported without any funky information?
Spinning animation report
Tracer like darts report
having the speed back up to what it used to be would be nice but ‘in excess of mach 3’ isnt very helpful and their statement of ‘fastest missile of its type in the world’ what type are they talking about? surface to air or IR guided? its just a bit too vague.
1 Like
I’ll take a look tomorrow.
1 Like
Cheers for taking a look at these, I have just realised in my first report the footage I’ve used for comparison might have been from the apache test, to rectify this https://youtu.be/o9qGiJgfSVg?t=11 at 00:11 is a decent example of a nice track.
1 Like
The data sheet from Thales AVS shows that Stormer has an acquisition range of 18km for Fighter Ground Attack (FGA) and 8km for Helis
also, I assume the launch sequence is max time when launching in a salvo?
Yet it barely locks things past 7km.
GJN uses the best possible sources right?
Right?
Lmao. Just play Russia.
1 Like
I feel like it’s not only the stormer
The so called Missile realistic rework did destroy alot of missiles
I can’t really see how it’s realistic that an aa missile becomes completely uncontrollable past 5km
Just Flying in the general area the vehicle is targeting and has soon
It’s Moving a Tiny bit up and down the missile just oversteers out of control
Also speaking of realism how come that gun lead radars are inaccurate basically adding a few 200 Meters in Error just for fun
And in case of the Stinger they found some old documents and just Copy pasted it across all Versions
Imagine if we only had proper documentation for the aim9b gaijins would conclude the aim9L/aim9m/aim9x would perform the same
Imagine a f22 with effective aim9b,s
1 Like
Not the Vikhr, surprise surprise. Even when the dev tried to demonstrate the “nerf” on the livestream it was still clapping jets - he had to fire it from max range and basically make it miss. Clownery.
The ADAD has a acquisition range that’s not the IR sight. Although with the lack of any other information on the IR sight the ADAD range could be used as a guide for the IR sight.
I’ve submitted a report for this.