1
2
All i have, and also enough to have, as they are 2 manufacturer brochures, so 2 primary sources
Oh yea, also STAIRSC is here, im blind hehe
1 Like
They have their fax listed. I wonder if they would answer any questions we might have…
Well, if you are brave enough then you can contact them simply by mail. They might answear whatever you want from them, but they are not obligated to do so
ALSO IF YOU WRITE DO NOT TELL YOU ARE DOING IT FOR WAR THUNDER
that is a automatic red flag
2 Likes
If you mean email, i tried to contact raytheon earlier but since my email is as inconvincing as my Gaijin name i didn’t get any good results lol.
If by mail, i could try this.
Agreed
Well, im still waiting for a reply from BAE on my email, hehe
I remember once someone asked on Thales Defence’s Twitter about the thermal imager that the Stormer HVM uses.
2 Likes
How long have you been waiting for?
2 months (yea i know they ignored me)
Yes, it was used in a bug report.
Alright. Twitter seems to be a possible way of contacting them too. Do we need to know anything else other than the missile max speed and the existence of lead indicator? If they reply positively without supplying documents, is that considered a primary source anyway or just expert opinion?
Classified, Mach 3+ as brochure
There is none as the computer automaticly leads the missile for the crew, all the gunner does is lock the target and fire, computer does the rest
Alright. I had heard something about a lead indicator in itself. I guess that was not true then. We should have a lead indicator anyway if they are not ready to implement automatic lead.
Not like they are not ready, they need the footage of the computer doing it, like a footage of the station where gunner fires and does not touch anything else (as you can imagine, hard to get)
1 Like
So the primary sources would not be enough if fully automatic engagement is mentioned? (primary as in sense of documents from manufacturer)
That is becasue the sources say High degree of automation provides a fire and forget system capability and automatic target tracking and engagment providing fire and forget capability.
The devs are not sure what that means (yes a excuse)
we’ll have to see what gaijin do but it’d be nice if we had some info on its separation so hitting aircraft under 1km isnt based on luck
Anyone having major phasing issues? Cause I am.
Can’t say i am personally, I’ve shot down over 100 aircraft the last night couple of nights and I’d say out of 70 shots 2 i can say for 100% certainly they went through the aircraft.
Well, the phasing got fixed sub 100 ping, if you go over 100 ping, you will be phasing
