Why is the Pzh2000 the same BR as the PLZ05?

You can’t add the most absurd safety features to a Leopard and screw it over on one end, and on the other just disregard real world performance and make up numbers.

Gaijin has gotten way to comfortable manipulating things based on their idea for the game and neglecting their real world performance to a point where what they ‘‘believe’’ and ‘‘think’’ is outweighing official documentation.

And now if they disagree it’s ‘‘a clear marketing lie’’ but lets apply that to Russian propaganda material of course.

3 Likes

The Bundeswehr and the Italian Army all uses manual overrides,there are some videos showing the gunner operating it manually,it’s called a Redundancy System ;)

1 Like

I can’t contradict you on that

I know, but having seen it during numerous exercises, I have never seen manual firing. This is extremely rare, especially with all guided shells.

Never seen it=/=never used it.

Manual firing is a thing,wheter you like it or not. So it’s obvious that Gaijin bends the reality on its will by ruining vehicles with made-up stats

more like 5 - 7 seconds lol

2 Likes

And to tell you the truth, the PZH can even shoot faster. The figures we find date from the test of 1997 I believe.

But it depends on the conditions. For example, after a burst of 3 shots, you must wait for the gun to cool down, otherwise the rate of fire will be significantly impacted.

VIDAR should be 8.7, PLZ05 8.3, Pzh2000 and Type99 8.0

1 Like

Yes and the same conditions doesnt count on the plz05? or why is it faster at the same br? where source for faster reload on china copycat psh XD ?

1 Like

this has a reload of 8.6 seconds

no bias in this game right?

7 Likes

Probably some Gaijin devs favorite vehicle.

Of course yes

Even by their own logic, a larger crew space would give faster reload, yet something the size of a house would result in a 13s reload.

They’re so full of it.

1 Like

VIDAR going to 8.7 in the current state of the game is a bit too much to ask to be honest.

Why?

What the hell even happened to it?

Fuel got reduced from 6:20 min to 4:00 for the me163s.

I dont have the ki-200 but It got changed aswell and it only had 4 min to begin with. Might now be even lower.

Wouldnt be that bad if it would be similar to the BI which has less trust but for some reason much better climbrate or they added the me263 with more fuel

4 minutes… yeah that seems about right for how long Gaijin wants a match to last.

Me 163 has 3 minutes which is 3:59 somehow… the Ki-200 has 4 minutes which is 4:10 somehow.

It’s still an unstabilized tank with 2 degrees of gun depression and awful gun handling. It has a 7.8s base reload for the first couple of shells only, then it’s reload speed tanks drastically (~13s base).

The whole premise of VIDAR being good lies in it’s LRF paired with thermals while going against unstabilized tanks with no LRF. At 8.7 most of that will disappear making it a niche pick at the very best.

2 Likes

The real question for me is the following:

  • Why is VIDAR at 8.0?
  • Why is PLZ 05, PzH 2000 at 7.7?
  • Why is Type 99, Sholef at 7.3?
  • Why is AuF 1 at 7.0?
  • Why is Bkan 1C, G6 at 6.7?
  • Why is PLZ 83, M109A1, 2S3M, Type 75 SPH at 6.3?
  • Why is M109G, 2S1 at 6.0?
  • Why is Lorraine 155 at 4.3?
  • Why is M44 at 4.0?
5 Likes