iriaf should get 6 fakour90,also very good i think
Out of the tanks you listed, I agree that 2S38, Pantsyr are undertiered. USSR tree does have more OP tanks than US (the opposite is true for air). You mentioned many CAS options, but as a whole US has much stronger CAS options, except for top tier where it is slightly inferior.
Addressing the other tanks which I know enough about to judge:
Object 292 (10.7): This tank is fine. The cannon is the strongest in-game, but its optics and armour are noticeably lacking for its BR. It also has a long reload.
Object 120 (8.0): A glass cannon. No depression nor armour, bad optics, and slow traverse. Yes, the firepower is great, but I don’t understand why you find this to be undertiered.
BMP-2M (10.3): This is a tank which looks undertiered only to those who haven’t played it. As a light tank, the lack of depression makes it very hard to play. You are forced to adopt a “flat terrain” or direct playstyle. Therefore, in almost all cases, it is inferior to MBTs at the same rating.
If you’re gonna lie, at least TRY to be believable. You fail in every metric.
Pantsir having a shite lock? Lol. Lmao even. Locks every enemy CAS the moment it spawns.
Being easy to kill has nothing to do with the fact they are both still undertiered. Naturally you’ll defend your OP toys, though. Typical IvanBoo.
Also, my stats are negative in most Ivan vehicles because I purposefully throw matches so Russia loses more. It’s not that hard to figure out but I guess kids these days can’t put 2 and 2 together.
It literally is Pantsir have terrible lock that jumps at anything even bombs.
Well seems to be you “throwing” on most of your vehicles why you hate America so much ?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The few people who replied to you are quite interesting, as they cannot even reach a consensus on their own evaluation criteria for OP vehicles. In the end, some of them decided to ignore the opinions of others and focus on attacking you, while others didn’t even express their views and just left a meaningless mockery.
-
You just have a skill issue with the Pantsir from the sound of things.
-
If you’re using statshark to try and pull a " Gotcha " you’re wasting your time as that website doesn’t accurately track statistics. I know it doesn’t because it tracks none of my naval history, which means it can’t accurately track anything else. Typical 3rd party website limitations. People like you who try to crutch on it are hilarious.
Statshark ? Why ? I can see your performance in game profile
M901 must be OP too
Us players lack the braincells to use them so its not much of a problem.
Not much of a reason forit to be 8.7 when the much better PTZ 09 is at 9.0 with LRF, a better round and the 5s reload… the obj 120 is fine were it is.
It is 10.3 already…
Correct me if I’m wrong the KV-1 doesnt have a modelled MG port but the KW I C does.
I am pretty sure that’s a clear shoot sign of russian bias in the game.
really? Thats interesting!
The ones that uses the old model of the kv1 like the kv1 f11 or like the german the kv 1B doesnt, the kv1s for example does have the mg port modelled.
It isnt is it just that they all use an old less detailed model, just like the germans pz4 doesnt have the driver port modelled either.
I mean its a op vehicle
Yeah no. Mig 29 is much better than f14 today
In ground? Not really no
TBF, vs sth like ZBD04A they are quite low. There is an argument to be made on whether the protection, extra rounds and sabot was worth all the sacrifices. Although I do think this low down gen 2 thermals are really nice and 20 second reload is not unthinkable considering they are 750 pen and u do have a 30mm.
ZLT11 also has one of the most powerful ammunition at just 9.7, I mean the VT-5 top ammunition literally the same one being use at 11.0. This thing is a bus without gun depression though lol