Statshark ? Why ? I can see your performance in game profile
M901 must be OP too
Us players lack the braincells to use them so its not much of a problem.
Not much of a reason forit to be 8.7 when the much better PTZ 09 is at 9.0 with LRF, a better round and the 5s reload… the obj 120 is fine were it is.
It is 10.3 already…
Correct me if I’m wrong the KV-1 doesnt have a modelled MG port but the KW I C does.
I am pretty sure that’s a clear shoot sign of russian bias in the game.
really? Thats interesting!
The ones that uses the old model of the kv1 like the kv1 f11 or like the german the kv 1B doesnt, the kv1s for example does have the mg port modelled.
It isnt is it just that they all use an old less detailed model, just like the germans pz4 doesnt have the driver port modelled either.
I mean its a op vehicle
Yeah no. Mig 29 is much better than f14 today
In ground? Not really no
TBF, vs sth like ZBD04A they are quite low. There is an argument to be made on whether the protection, extra rounds and sabot was worth all the sacrifices. Although I do think this low down gen 2 thermals are really nice and 20 second reload is not unthinkable considering they are 750 pen and u do have a 30mm.
ZLT11 also has one of the most powerful ammunition at just 9.7, I mean the VT-5 top ammunition literally the same one being use at 11.0. This thing is a bus without gun depression though lol
Its a fantastic tank mate with 6 crew, 3 x 50 cals, arguably should be 7.3
the T32E1 is a great tank for its BR to be fair, outwith the M103 and Conquoror it’s one of hte bets 7.7 heavies in the game?
APDS is great, the turret traverse is great, the 48kmph while not great, is not slow, it has good HP/PT, and a good reload, as well as decent armour
M1 Abrams is not ass.
its 10.7 with great optics and a 5 second reload and a 215 angle pen.
extremely mobile
the 2AV is not better, it lacks thermals and reload in comparison.
The M1A1 should be 11.7 its comparable BR’d tank is the leopard 2PL which the M1A1 is arguably better than bar in Thermal imaging quality.
Better round
better reload
more effective armour
about equal mobility
not got the leopard hump over the back
turret isnt as weak.
I mean it is pretty annoying without depression or reverse, two almost requirements for light tank. Neither does it have any protection. Also the reload sucks.
It could have gotten better but the reload and BR, otherwise for sure 11.3/11.7.
Bear in mind the Object 120 is premium, but that shouldn’t make it immune to being placed in a proper BR. The PTZ89 is tech tree and yes, it is undertiered for 9.0BR - It could easily go to 9.3BR.
Then there’s the PLZ05 in the tech tree for West Tai and it’s also undertiered at 7.7 just like the PzH2K.
Also, I’ll admit I forgot that the BMP-2M finally got uptiered to 10.3
Hahaha this is one of the funniest copes I’ve seen.
Complaining about the bmp3, that’s a new one…
Still 8.7 is not a proper Br for the object 120, just the round by itself doent justify to be such a br since you pretty much deletes any advantage that the obj 120 have while keeping all the disadvantages that it has as it get completely outmatched at longer ranges against tanks with laser range finder, and there is are a lot of other tanks that have similar penetration at 9.0 aside from the ptz 09, while they still have better roeload, stabilizer better optics and lrf, like the type 74 or chieftain mk10, the thing is at 8.7 it is completely outmatched by even things like the brenus.
Btw it is not better that the of 40 at 8.0…
What do you mean 100mm cannon, do you use the “fugas” rounds or that missile “knows were it is at all times” and produces superb “hits”. BMP-3 is very situational and unreliable at best. Yes when it catches the Leo1a1a5s and the like yes it works but the magic begleit with engine armor ohh boy there you get way too many hihiha moments.
Not to mention Swedish and German T-72s and the legendary armored Tam 2IP that can tank several shots. Yes against most lights and a lot of leo1a1s plus mbts-70s it works but anything with armor and you will struggle.