Nope, it’s definitely correct, and, there was, a whole thread that talks about it.
Again, TOW-2 is 8.7, and Vikhr is 11.0, that’s the differences.
@warthogboy09
So because a game bug is occurring that means everyone’s wrong?
Russians really just do look down on us non-Russians.
@meki98 also claiming it’s pointless to argue with everyone that isn’t Russian.
Disgusting xenophobia.
And now Meki claims that I’m a “Russian propaganda poster” because I want 2S38 to move up in BR, one of his favorite light tanks in the game.
I bet Meki defended Ka-50 being 10.3 and I was demanding it to be moved up.
what the hell. it was literally the other way around wth
i am constantly complaining the ka50 and 2s38 are to good for the places they are in and now you are trying to claim the 2s38 is my favorite
but you said if the 2s38 goas up so should the cv9040c
which is simply ridiculous the 3s28 needs to go up while the cv9040c needs to stay were it is or even go down given the nerfs it received and the other cv9040 surrounding it which all are better
@meki98
So you agreed with me that 2S38 should move up?
And that Ka-50 should be 11.0 where it is today?
Cause your post implied you argued against 2S38 and Ka-50 moving up in the past by claiming to have disagreed with my desire to have them move up.
The difference is Ka-50 did move up, and I got exactly what I wanted, a balanced Ka-50.
Not a single 11.0 helicopter is inferior to Ka-50, whereas many now 10.7s were.
If you’re going to disagree with someone, make sure you know their position 100%, otherwise they’ll correctly assess you took their opposite position.
Ka-50 already moved up, you got exactly what you wanted.
wen did i do that show me?
wen did you say the 2s38 needs to go up and please dont say the cv9040c and 2s38 need to go to 10.3 which for the cv9040c is to high and for the 2s38 to low
2s38 needs 10.7 minimum
who started? you did
Ka-50/52s are annoying but they aren’t the game changing beasts they were, just hop in an AA or autocanon IFV with tracking
So now it’s a bug? I thought it wasn’t possible anymore! That’s what you said after all. The lengths you go to move goalposts is incredible really.
LMFAO. Take your meds and stay losing Razervon.
Its not that hard to counter, just extremely annoying to be, for example, sprayed by ka52 cannon apds when your in an MBT and dying without even making it to the battle itself
1 Like
Yeah I know, I’ve started to spawn the ZBD04 first out of fear of being rushed by helis, lmao
@warthogboy09
Keep claiming War Thunder players are all wrong, all your posts do is protect War Thunder from crticism.
“Gaijin are incapable of making mistakes like bugs!” type nonsense.
A new bug appears and I acknowledge it instantly.
Your psots demean those that are quick to acknowledge facts as they appear, a rather toxic behavior.
I’m trying to spade the PUMA so i can start grinding the other puma that’s gonna get released soon so i can finally firstspawn a decent IFV lol… beglietpanzer is goated too though so no biggie
1 Like
aaah yes, gaijin, who removes paper tanks of other countries and adds only russian paper tanks
There are zero paper tanks in the Soviet tech tree.
They were never even developed by Gaijin.
So nice implying that Germany and Japan are Russian with that bogus statement.
It seems like a flawed comparison. The Shturm is faster than the Hellfire, it doesn’t mean that they are in any way comparable or that Hellfire-carrying helos cannot go up in BR given the already great BR difference…
Both Vikhr and TOW-2 are line-of-sight AGMs that fire “one at a time”*.
Yes, I know you can ripple fire as many as you can press within 2.8 seconds, and that’s not a rule.
So the primary differences: Speed and distance, are the notable things that’ll cause a difference in BR.
Similarly to how AGM-114 is [incorrectly] 10.3 currently on the low end.
Lynx today is Ka-50 of the past.
There are other primary differences, such as utility. Having proxy fuses, F&F, Thermals, and optimal flight trajectory all impact missile performance. The Vihkr is a much better utility missile than the Hellfires when it comes to dealing with aerial threats and SPAAs.
Proxy fuse is a negative as it reduces the penetration capability of the missile.
Ka-50 also lacks thermals, F&F, and optimal flight trajectory.
Cause line-of-sight AGMs are a negative.
Not that I have noticed…
True, but the missile is still extremely capable for its BR. You get free kills on Helicopters and can dish out a ton of damage without having to worry too much about SPAAs.
Uh, no. Beam-riding missiles are better in game than top-down missiles, unless you introduce F&F into the equation, then top-down is (arguably) better.
1 Like
Like what?
What are you talking about bro? You’re in a helicopter not in a tank, ofc it’s harder to get an Abrams front aspect with a Tow missile, but you’re not front aspect, you’re in a helicopter in a top-down position, literally any AGM in the game one shots(unless a War Thunder moment happens), if you hit the roof of a tank