Stinger with proxy fuse
yeah thats why its 9.7. Lav ad has it to with brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt and hvar rocktes. ozelot just have missels, tho its not that bad lik the one from Imp.Charparl
imp.chaprral my beloved. I havent really played it since they removed the smokeless motor.
It was pretty decent when it had that.
Its soilid cos not evrey body has flares. but the lack of radar makes it a bit bad
Proxy IRCCM missile that never gives warnings while having a search function.
9.7 is correct for it.
Type 93 is an inferior vehicle to Ozelot.
Depends entirely on map, type 93 is more versatile at the cost of being a marginally worse SPAA
It’s not marginally worse, it’s worse.
Lacking search functionality is a 0.7+ BR difference.
The Type 93’s speed, which only translates to marginal mobility improvements due to the wheeled vehicle vs tracked, is clearly enough to cause that 0.7+ to be closer.
It’s still a worse SPAA. Lacking a search function will always be worse.
Like somebody said earlier the type 93 also spent years as probably the worst vehicle in the game with its missiles quite literally not functioning for years on end. It was everything from just slamming into the dirt to Whenever it got close to a plane it would massively overcorrect and miss the plane without setting off its fuse either. There was a point in time when it wouldn’t even track the plane it would just go wherever it wanted. And several dozen times in which you couldn’t fire the missile at all you’d hit the button nothing would happen the game would play a reload effect and then you’d have 9/8 missiles and you’d then be bugged unable to shoot for the rest of the match.
Well this isn’t a conversation about the type 93 2 years ago, it’s long since been fixed and very capable
Idk it still suffers pretty poorly from this issues popping back up every once and a while, and the ozelot does have the irst search function no? that makes it quite a fair bit better than the Type 93. If they gave the type 93 per say its better variant of the ata missile it uses as well as maybe admit that while it may look like a stinger it isnt a stinger and performs better than maybe it could go up in br.
worse missile (10G vs 13G for Ozelot), no radar. Yeah, sure better. Toyota better only in locking targets, but worse in everything else except speed
Type 91 Kai would be nice, but they are very similar capability wise, and i’ve managed to make the Type 93 work in my 12.7 lineup, it’s improved 10 fold since the ir SAM fixes last year
Nobody was yelling at you. I was simply stating that the IRST, although useful, still has its quirks.
Fair enough, personally I think they are side-grades of each other, Ozelot has a little faster, more agile missile and better situational awareness, Type 93 has Photo-contrast that is… odd, on auto it seems basically non-functional, but if you manually que it, it seems to be rather deadly.
I honestly wouldn’t mind if they where the same BR… as long as the Ozelot goes down, not the Type 93 going up.
Type 93 should be 9.7, I agree. The optical contrast lock alone makes it much more powerful than other 9.3 SPAA, and on par with 9.7s like the Roland 1. I also believe it’s slightly superior to the Ozelot.
However, I don’t think that Ozelot necessarily should go to 9.3. Adding on to what others have said, it is also very small in size, making it hard to spot. Additionally, it is harder to destroy as well. If you have ever tried to use ATGMs against an Ozelot (from helicopter, for example), you’ll find that it’s very hard to hit unless they are unaware of you and stationary. And unlike the Type 93, a near miss usually won’t do any damage.
1 Like
nah the ozelot can find targets much easier than the type93… depends on what you need both are probably too low but I think the ozelot is worse for helis since even flanking is instantly discovered
Type 93 is simply undertiered.
actually it’s only thing Type 93(10G missiles) have, Roland for sure better (Radar + SACLOS). Same for Ozelot(“Radar” + 13G missiles). Type 93 need assistance in finding air targets and most of time it can’t hit super close targets (less than 1-2 km)
Well, Roland is 10.0
Optical lock is actually arguably one of best things in AA’s
You can get a jet locked well beyond that IR lock range on it. And funny thing is, that next having optical lock is 10.3. So yes, type 93 should either get rid of that optical lock and stay in 9.3 or it should be moved up to 9.7