Never!
well there are scenarios where stat checking (or “shaming” if you want to call it that) is more than enough.
if theres someone claiming that F-4J/S is terrible plane and needs to go down to 11.0 BR, do you
A) engage in lengthy argument about its kit and how its best played
B) check his stats and see dude is 400 deaths to 20 kills and call him out on that?
Because it’s slow for a light tank. In fact most MBTs have a higher power to weight to it.
If his post is crap sure who cares but if hes outlining from his perspective why just tear those points apart.
For instance even in this thread we have this,
I just reponded with a joke,
theres nothing to say to this because its just flat out wrong and theres no room for interpretation otherwise.
Indeed, I would too until Gaijin fixes the TOW-2B flying behaviour and real penetration values, until then is a situational weapon.
1 Like
It’s indeed, but this has nothing to do with this discussion and I believe it’s just anger, going after a personal discussion rather than the topic in this thread.
1 Like
The M3A3 Bradley is overtiered, in it’s current state it’s honestly 9.7 or 9.3 material.
It has poor mobility, a big silhouette, poor survivability, mediocre autocannon, and suffers from a missile launcher which cannot fire on the move and needs time to be made ready after stopping.
2S38 can destroy many opposition MBTs even from the front, while moving. The M3A3 cannot do the same. It’s not a good comparison
1 Like
It has everything to do with this discussion.
You can dismiss topics by stating that if person have not played vehicle it cant talk about its performance and its just cope and at the same time talk about performance of vehicle that you havent played in different topic.
Bottom line, it makes you a hypocrite. And thats not even mentioning the probable ill will behind it.
its 10.3 because it makes gaijin a lot of money
Why then is RDF/LT at 11.7?
1 Like
how about lowering the HSTVL to 11.0
2 Likes
Tbh I see them a lot however every single time they eat sht and die to something like an Strv 122. Its not really viable at top tier but if you want to rush the Su-30/4 its fine.
I still have to look up a player that does exceptionally well in his 2S38 and isn’t just permastuck at 1.0 K/D.
I feel thats more player issue rather than vehicle one.
Or like in my case, coping about APHE being the main shell.
That’s as if you put the 2S38 back to 9.7.
Equipped with a huh?
The production variant can be 11.0 as it has a new fire control radar and will have the guided proximity rounds.
The UD I agree, the jury’s out on the 2S38 but the AV!!?? The T-72AV is not 10.7 material by a long shot.
The M1128 and similar armed guns can lol pen the UFP. It’s the least armoured and least mobile Soviet 10.3 MBT, solely being carried by it’s non-Soviet optical suite.
1 Like
Because it is slow
Its not because its slow, or entirely. People (like me when I first bought it) think its some death machine but you lose every single face 2 face encounter in it, you have to flank, like pretty much any auto cannon vic. Problem is ya mobility isn’t great, but its not terrible. The bigger problem is because its so tall, and has awful gun depression, you can’t just sit behind any hill, use 3rd person/binos find a target pop out and kill them because by the time you get your gun on target you have to crest the entire hill and you are dead meat. You have to go look for weird spots were you can flank, also be behind cover, but have a spot you can fire from without exposing too much, but you always expose more of your vic than someone with better depression+profile, so there is always more risk involved.
Usually I have to find a spot I can move forward past a hill’s edge to pop out take my shots and then reverse into cover back behind that hill, finding an actual hull down spot for a 5 degree depression tank is not easy, and instead of just exposing the top part of your tank, my entire half front hull is basically visible when doing this.