The M1A2 should have revised Composite side skirts, and there is the SE Block II Hull upgrade that we don’t know if it was deployed (Weight budget didn’t permit the revised Hull array though intent remained to field it, don’t know if it was complete, or to what degree it would increase from the baseline 325mm RHAe characteristic of all M1s too that point).
Known Turret side improvements also aren’t implemented, among assorted other modeling issues.
Ok, thx but sideskirtts are the first smaller buff in weight? iirc around like 3 tons only and it made possible to install ARAT? Only after that the hull got the 10t upgrade?
All just informational questions, dont really know much about those tanks tbh…but Gaijin not modelling certain stuff, surprise? nah lol
I believe the reasoning as to why none of the improvements were modeled is because no one knows what specific part of the array was improved/how much effectiveness it added. Gaijin doesn’t know how much effectiveness the improvements added and they sure as hell don’t want to guess. Basically unless you get concrete numbers nothing is going to change, and those numbers are obviously classified.
That’s a brainded statement, none of these things you said are true, especially the heli part because Russia get the best, always.
And that’s literally your opinion and it’s honestly a dumb one, what matters in Top Tier is armor, what’s the point in grinding to 12.7 when your tank is made out of plastic and can disabled by WW1 SPAA.
What matters most in top tier is speed of the vehicle and its reload speed…by that point everyone should learn and know where to aim for EACH tank they face and having the movement speed to run around and shoot fast is THE ONLY way to capitalize on it.Counting on bouncing and tanking shots is recipe for disaster. Its like expecting that F2A ADTW with its busted and asthmatic Fox 1 missiles can be a fair comparison to a Su30MK at .3 BR higher but thats Gaijins faulty logic anyway…
I’m sure you would know, considering you don’t even have RU top tier.
After 179 buff the 28NM and 64E are rather equal.
And that discredits everything you’ll ever say about top tier.
LMUR is still better buddy.
What that gotta do with American lineup?
If saying the truth and disagreeing with your opinion discredit me then im happy with that.
Can we steer this back to the topic and not start resorting to passive aggressiveness?
Nope its not, by that logic Japan is the best nation and Type 90’s are the best tanks, while in reality its not.
8x LMUR vs 16x JAGM. The count makes up for it.
Generally, when you compare 2 things, you should probably have both before you make an opinion on which is better :)
“the truth” alrighttttttttttttttt
8 LMUR kills vs 16 critical hits from JAGM.
What is than by your logic? Anything made in RU is the thing that matters most? Everythings sht except RU stuff which you dont have and have NEVER played?
Trying out the vehicles of the nation that you love/hate quite heavily shifts the opinion on whats OP and whats not when you see the stuff you have to do with a completely different platform like RU is compared to anything from the west
False but ok.
If you want to prove a point how NATO stuff is dog water at least try to sound believeable pls… 99% of the time when JAGMs are flying towards you endlessly you dont even see the heli thats shooting them for whatever reason…destroying 8 LMURs is also considerably easier job for SPAA than doinking 16 JAGMs. The thing that was literally made for destroying such stuff has “only” 12 missiles
I had a hard time figuring out what you said.
I mean buddy, check out any video from any content creator and anyone that literally tried both and said the same thing, LMUR with more damage and better lofting and that literally makes it better.
Also you need 3-4 JAGMs to destroy a single tank while LMUR does not.
In recent videos JAGM’s seem to perform just fine :)
Usually 1-2. You also don’t seem to have 64E/28NM either so i’m sure you would know.
“Just fine” not better than LMUR? I rest my case.
