See best way to put this is Step1: Cope Step2: Seeth and most importantly and I can’t stress this enough Step3: Mald
1 Like
we are in 2025 and people still fall in the Pantsir suck rage bait, we are trully witnessing history!
7 Likes
Correct me if im wrong but its Exlposive reactive armour. One thing is tanks which hav e 30mm of steel or more behind the ERA, but planes? with like, 5mm of aluminium? how does that not just self destruct the plane?
because its rusky, according to the stat 10mm of russian armor = 100mm of pesky western low quality alloy.
Russians just build different
My comments have been sarcastic just like the OP maybe you should learn sarcasm 😂😂😂
Best SAM in the game.
Struggling.
Russia falling behind, when it is literally the lead nation for SAM systems.
Lolled at bait.
1 Like
That checks out i suppose
I dont think theyre planes are sporting an outer fouselage thicker than 15mm and certianly not pure steel on the whole thing, I highly doubt Konakt 5 is actually mounted and used on Su25s
War thunder forums often dont dissapoint to entertain me
?? Are you refering to yourself?
2 Likes
Perhaps I do
They should remove TOR-M1 from China and give it to USSR now that China has the HQ-17 and give China the FK-2000
Systems like S-300 (or S-500…) are way to overpowered for the Game. Maybe can be added once we also have F-22, F-35, J-20 and the likes in the Game.
Doesn’t the Russian tech tree have a Tor-M1? And Chinese I think.
You mean the XM246, which is just a M247 with smaller guns? The Pantsir is the best SPAA in the game by a long shot.
No, only China has the Tor-M1 - for whatever reason they gave it to China and not USSR idk.
That’s strange. Seems like a Russian vehicle would be added to the Russian tech tree but I guess it isn’t surprising.
It’s even dumber since China has so many domestic Options and now has both the Tor-M1 and the HQ-17 (Copy+Paste but with better chinese Missiles). They could have given China the HQ-17 directly so now we could have had another domestic SPAA for them and the Tor-M1 in USSR Tree…instead of both in Chinas Tree and no domestic/unique one…
1 Like
I would prefer Tor M1 in the tree instead of the Pantsir S1. I would trade the missile range for the mobility that platform has to it, because positioning matters much more than just range.