Again.
1 Like
Again
This is not an answear to what I have asked.
It wouldn’t delay the use of CAs but rather make it rarer and less effective.
Still not an answear
All You propose is changing the frequency of problem appearing but not fixing it.
1 Like
Do you understand the word effective
Because there is nothing to be fixed,… overall the game works as intended,… that’s you guys don’t understand.
All we propose here is to make TO fans able to enjoy their side of the game,…
@Tagnoch : let them be dreaming, the fantasy of TO is unlikely to happen,… maybe ten more years will make them able to accept what we’re are proposing to them.
1 Like
Still not an answear to asked question
1 Like
You can do that by wanting TO to happen ;)
2 Likes
Not really. More voices does not change the “not in their vision” stance which is the reason they gave (rest is mainly forum member driven).
You could always start asking Gaijin for once rather than expecting other players to answer your questions (which inevitably should be to Devs; people just answer the best they can). But where is the fun in that I suppose.
Lack of progress is still firmly in the court of those who desperately need or want it.
1 Like
Nah, there are more important things to fix in WT, including in GRB. Like Map design and Spawn locations.
On a game wide level. TO people make up a tiny % of the community, considering ground is only the second most popular gamemode currently after air. Fixing ARBs issues would improve the quality of the game for far more people.
Adding TO would create more problems than it would solve initially and only benefit a minority of the community. It doesnt make sense from a buissness perspective. Hell they wont even add an Air RB EC gamemode or run Naval EC 24/7 because they dont want to split the playerbase, and you expect them to ever add TO?
On the list of gamemode changes I want:
- Add larger maps to ARB
- Air RB EC gamemode added
- Decent Heli Gamemodes added (could be a total overhaul of Heli PvE)
- Overhaul of Air Sim EC (add more objectives and refine the current ones)
- Improve Naval spawn points
- General naval improvements
- Ground spawn location overhaul
- Add new objective types to ground
- Improve grund map design
- Overhaul SP cost for all vehicles, inclduing aircraft of all types
TO doesnt even make the top 10
2 Likes
Who have said that I didn’t ask it already when there were surveys?
1 Like
Did they reply? (I assume you meant to say you asked, just your cryptic way is not always clear (you don’t need that first “have” as it messes the sentence))
I have wrote in survey that asked what improvments would You like to see in the game.
If Gaijin had replied, I would provide the answear here.
1 Like
And from that survey they added the things the playerbase as a whole wanted. We are finally getting things like Split BRs for Aircraft (which will only buff aircraft) and split counter-measures (which again, will actually buff aircraft)
Tells you all you need to know about what the community want. 2 of the roadmap changes will directly buff aircraft and rarely nerf them,
1 Like
*answer
3 Likes
OK… so we don’t know what you asked but did not get a reply. Slowly getting there…
So again,
Just remove the “for once” and set to go!
If there is a survey asking for players input regarding game chanes, I always write there what I think.
But again, I will discuss things on forum as TO is the only solution that doesn’t require changing current gamemode (which many like) in order to satisfy a population of players.
1 Like
Don’t worry, you missed what was said again. But thanks anyway for trying 👍(edit: not sarcastic for those who are used to twisting everything).
Split BRs for Aircraft (which will only buff aircraft)
It’s theoretically possible to split BRs and still nerf aircraft into the ground, but yes I see what you’re saying.
I think it’d be difficult to find somebody who thinks those things aren’t a good idea. Is there anything everybody can agree on with tanks?