Why don’t you ping him, to have your answer? @Stona_WT
Didn’t you asked me to found Gaijin answers?
Here’s one.
But as you don’t wanna listen, you’re not taking it into account, which show you’re impressive stubbornness,… sad it have to be on a subject that will not move even in 5000 years after your death,…
No he didnt rush to support you did he and you couldn’t find your evidence of the amazing TO GRB tests you claimed happened. It was a day of ass kicking for you my friend to be sure.
I don’t need to drag Stona in to this. Gaijin have the option at any time to put this to bed and many take the fact they have not as a sign that they are listening and thinking it over. It is a chance to wipe out the nearest opposition and that has to be tempting.
You dont get to be the gate keeper over this sadly as much as you think you are.
Thank you for saying it far better and in fewer words than I ever could.
In short summary the only long term solution I see to this mess is:
eliminate rage mechanics (kill cam, midair aircraft spawns, zone cap messages, helipad FOBs being too close to map)
greatly empower the counters to the point where no sane player can come up with a logical reason why they can’t/won’t use them other than personal choice. And if its personal choice, the fault lies with that player alone, not the game.
give CAS (and tanks where possible) a bunch more objectives so that diehards in both arguing camps have more things to blow up ingame than just each other.
The ironic part is that the game already has most or all of the pieces in its code to solve this mess. All it needs is the willpower and developer time/money/both to put them together.
Or just spare us all that and introduce TO GRB for the many who want it. I have just played Combined arms GRB and its good, yet I advocate GRB TO as being good for the game to move it on and look forward to another 12 years of WT.
No need for bitching and butthurt.
I think people like Cpt Bel V are just like football team supporters who are locked in a permanent view regardless of common sense.
You can go onto the old forum maybe and see me as a non-flyer bitching about CAS as a know nothing novice but that is not me anymore and its certainly not ULQ
And i think like you, are more like 12yo kids,…
Asking to remove what annoys them, without trying to search for compromises,…
I understand that in 2014 CAS was too strong,… yet the game is more or less adapted,… some changes would be appreciated, as said earlier,…
But even if the changes are needed, a complete removal of the pseudo-problem by adding TO, is not going to help in any ways possible.
That’s my point,…
Yet, i also search for why Gaijin still not have added what you guys (TO fans) are asking since 2014, and that’s exactly what i’ve been giving up to you,… (Game design choices/ Marketing / Testing)
Yet apart saying blindly that TO would help CA(Combined Arms) in which i don’t believe,… beither is Gaijin,… you bring nothing else on the table than Jets being outside of the range (that’s like 15% of the total game range - End game gameplay), and the fact that you guys are many (i’ve seen like 6 people on your side on this thread, and about 10 not being on your side)…
So,… each every ones of us have a PoV on that Matter, and so is Gaijin, which is the only one that decides in the end.
I don’t think you actually have a point that is my issue. I dont see you have anything that makes any sense when it comes to giving WT players what they demand and other than Queue time Gaijin don’t.
Many don’t share views on anything that is why we have a forum to discuss and debate nobody ever claimed we have one side in every argument. We have moderators on here who raise issues about the game ,your point is what exactly?
Didn’t take long to unravel that stupid comment, did it? Are you truly desperate bro? When you defend the indefensible you just get your arse kicked perpetually and that is what is happening for you.
You tried to get a moderator to save your ass and it didn’t happen and you tried to pretend TO was previously trialed but you can’t provide evidence.
You are stupid enough to think I invented the notion of a TO GRB ? If only.