GBU-24s and 1 or 2 other bombs as well. Yeah, I’m sure hellfires aren’t the only one, but it’s been quite a long time since those bugs were reported and nothing.
Is Ground SB on a simulation level for tankers?
I dont want bad weather
There already has been a great increase in low-visibility weather presets in the latest updates.
I’d actually be fine with those, if they didn’t increase the imbalance between tanks with thermals and those without and possibly add more graphical exploits. (Not sure if that is a thing right now, but it wouldn’t surprise me)
I struggle doing CAS with bad weather sometimes. Cant see my targets unless they scouted, which is good since it stops me from dominating 100% on F-4EJ/Kai and F-16 AJ/helis. Need to be closer to see with thermals on helis than normal.
Im looking at it right now, its not been long since the last spam about clouds lol
Yeah its a good way of mitigating CAS without artifiically nerfing it.
Don’t forget that a low cloud ceiling renders TV guided weapons useless since they can’t get a lock, while at the same time radar SPAA has no penalties. (Not complaining here, just pointing it out)
1 Like
The talk was about the name of the mode.
In Gaijin simulator standards, yes.
Am aware but cant separate the description from the name either. Description is part of the name, can’t be cherry picking parts, got to take the whole thing.
1 Like
The name is the name.
The description clearly states what it does and no one is arguing with that.
Yeah as told earlier :
You only want Gaijin to rename the mode, and i can agree on that →
@Smin1080p we agreed on something: go rename it ^^"
There already was a change from Tank Realistic Mode ;)
Well then, Smin should make it called:
Realistic Land Combined Arms (RLCA in short)
Arcade Land Combined Arms (ALCA)
Sim. Land Combined Arms (SLCA)
Same with “Navy”, for Ship Gamemodes,
So shorts make : ANCA / RNCA / SNCA
respectively ^^"
I think ground actually does perfectly describe the gamemode. As all the objectives are located on the ground.
1 Like
That’s currently what ULQ_LOVER Is not agreeing on,…
(and basically the most fastest fix ever → just changing some titles → easy)
1 Like
Sites like Thunderskill & WWIILogs estimate it’s about 8-10% of deaths, approximately.
But to show how ineffective SPAAG are (and why they need help, even if its in the form of short range lead indicators for non-radar ones), those same sites show deaths in planes from SPAAG at half that or even less.
Yep, and cases like this are where in the compromise ULQ totally swatted aside I wouldn’t mind aircraft usage being totally blocked. Real air forces don’t fly near any sort of low cloud cover due to turbulence even today.
Unless they are designed for it at least. Tornados with their TFR were designed to fly in any weather and time of day. A few others had the similar kit needed, like I think the F-111s
sums about right, out of the past games I played, i died from other tanks more times than from bombs.
1 Like