even if we propose something officially through suggestion, you would add your ways in the thread to make it fail,… so yeah you’re the damned one that kills both TO and CA at the same time.
So You know that I was replying according to what was being said :)
Didn’t know I have so much power in my hands, lmao
But You are proposing something which will make other players angry over me proposing something that can make everyone.
The problem is no '‘compromise’ will solve the issue of unbalance.
Your replies were all your own…nobody provoked the TO hype.
As for thread bloat and the need to read before replying, let me note 85 of the current 532 replies at yours…that is bloat. Be concise and clear in posting.
1 Like
no improvements required by community → no problem shown.
As supposed “CAS-players” we agree to make concessions,… you’re not as you say those improvments would make nothing for the game.
ok, so you don’t need those improvments → then by your own logic : There is no problem of CAS in Current gamemode
– END OF TO LOBBY –
1 Like
Right…
1 Like
i told you you’re wrong about that,…
that’s normal to think that both modes can’t co-exist,…
would you play a mode on which more threats are coming to you than the other mode proposed in which the only threat is similar to you?
- that’s just simple logic, and not a fact that proves CA is wrong in the first place -
So wrong you’re that you’re unable to see basic points of Psychology
1 Like
he was saying that the only TO player that cares about TO is you and that everyone else prefers to only improves the current mode with slight CAS nerfs.
so basically, you using my quote out of context, is simply wrong, and i react to you being a troll, and not him proving you wrong.
He didn’t say that, but You can talk with him about that ;).
I wasn’t the first to start about TO hype (that people would choose it over combined mode) and I have showed it.
you have showed nothing,… but ok think that, it will make me easier to live on,…
So move on.
If You would like to discuss TO, I will be there ;).
And for changes, I will be there to discuss them too, as on forum everyone can share their opinions.
thank lord, i don’t want TO - so that will be short.
right, then come in when your opinion would be different of: “this is no use, as it doesn’t 100% solve the problem”
1 Like
If proposed change is going to be like that, this is what I’m going to say.
you said that for EVERYTHING that have been proposed so far (in 10 years)
You want every vehicle to be able to counter every vehicle, even in a TO that wont happen
3 Likes
It is not the same.
If heavy tank allows this things to happen it is because he allowed that to happen, not that he can’t do anything to counter it. If one tank shoots at other, the other one can shoot back at it.
When talking about air vs tank situation, if air player doesn’t make a mistake, ground user is not able to do anythign about it.
On the ground I can do things with my tank in order to not allow things to happen (when talking about enemy tanks) while against air I can’t do anything.
In TO it will happen. Please provide an example of ground unit (not SPAA) that can’t defeat a tank on +/- 1 B.R. spread.
And why is that really?
1 Like
Yeah, I’d love Tornado Gr4 with 18 F&F Brimstones that can be rippled off, but that unfortunately won’t happen anytime soon or maybe even ever.
1 Like