11.7 is currently weaker tanks like the Ariete’s, Challenger 2’s, MBT-2000’s, etc
So for objectively better tanks like the 2A4M’s, then higher than 11.7 is the right place
If you want more decompression at higher BR’s, then ask away, but moving the 2A4M’s down is the opposite of decompression, its just compression, recompression even
Yet at 12.0 there are also tanks just as versatile but arguably better in some ways - namely M1A1 HC gets better reload and ready rack, also better sabot and proxy-fuze HEAT.
Oh well. Its not like 2A4CAN will move down anyway, and probably shouldnt. But it isnt all sunshine and rainbow with it.
What? Type 90’s round is notably worse than Leopard 2A4M’s.
I’ve been saying it for years, Britain 10.7 (formerly Britain 10.3) is goated.
As for OP, I think his judgement is being informed by the trash-tier winrate, since his performance is quite similar in both this tank and the Type90 he prefers.
I wonder if he is bringing a lineup, or just one death leaving and contributing to that 34% winrate.
I swear, I’m not sure if people gifting others high tier premiums are their friend or enemy.
matchmaker also plays large part, one game its perfectly fine, the other its raining LMURs.
It’s essentially leopard 2a5 with better thermals. Garbage hull.
lol no its not, the wedges on 2A4CAN are 10mm thick with nothing underneath, its a kit made for Afghanistan to protect against RPG-7s. Its effectively a vismod for 2A4.
Jeez, it should drop in BR then.
11.3 would be fitting. M1A1 at 11.3 have M829A1 which is better than KE-W
its moving to 11.7 with next update.
IMO that would be too low. Despite how it might sound from my initial comments, I dont think KEW is bad round.
I personally would like to see 2A4CAN at 11.7, but its likely not going to happen anytime soon. 11.7 Arietes would still hold firepower advantage due to having access to DM53s, whille challengers 2 would retain armor advantage while having similiarly performing round.
Challenger 2s are significantly worse. They have the same ish cannon, but their armour differences are negligible, despite the fact the Challenger is MUCH slower
are they? excluding the traditional weakspots such as gun breech (since everyone has that), isnt chally 2 turret significantly better than that of 2A4?
Turret is a bit better, but 3BM46 and the likes can still slice through it like butter at most ranges, especially in the close quarter maps that pop up. Not to mention a lot of the time you HAVE to expose your hull. I find the Abrams is the best armoured NATO tank in game
pretty much spaced armor for the turret front.
Possibly to confuse enemies as well so they might think its a 2a5/6
its afghanistan era upgrade, more likely than not its to provide a place to detonate RPG-7 that is easy to repair so you dont have to repair the entire 2A4 turret front underneath; as well as to provide spaced armor.
If you mean Type 90 can tank shells, it’s so funny because it’s armor like paper. But if you mean JM33 shell (it’s literally DM33 on L/44)
i mean yeah spaced armor, same thing as slat armor. Point of detonation is the job of spaced armor to make explosves and partialy tandems less effective
yeah, i was more going for a point that taliban doesnt really care whenever the tank is 2A5 or 2A4.
