I was given a 2A4M Leopard, and I removed 4 tons of dead weight from it, but it still doesn’t play at its 12.0 br, it doesn’t hold a projectile like a Type 90, it has a longer reload time due to the crew, and the only good thing it has is a normal thermal imager, maybe it should be given 11.7?
1 Like
It isn’t bad
2 Likes
but his combat rating is overrated, fuji played just like him before decompression
Shoulda read the review for it my guy, should have bought the Leo 123 instead.
1 Like
Ive got the elsa pack few weeks ago, the tank is effectively the same.
That being said, the upgrades it offers over base leo2A4 really arent worth 1.3 BR increase.
3 Likes
what round are you using since KEW is an alright shell at 12.0?
I was given it as a gift, and my friend said that if there was a discount of 123 he would buy it.
Only KEW
“only”, its an exceptional shell, more than enough for 12.7 let alone 12.0
at the same time, the clickbait has a 620 penetration projectile, and for example, it does not need to target the lower frontal armor of T tanks
Issue isnt shell, issue is that its Leo2A4 with only minor improvements to armor scheme at BR where Leopard 2A4s mobility and gun handling arent that special.
3 Likes
Nothing wrong with its gun handling or mobility
There’s always this myth that stuff like gun handling isn’t great if there are other tanks that also have great gun handling
This would be true, but there is one problem that only the Abrams and Leopard have, this is their horizontal guidance system, and on a Canadian without armor on its BR it is felt even more strongly
What problem?
Never implied it has bad gun handling.
I said that the advantage of good gun handling and mobility that makes Leo2A4 so good at 10.7 over its contemporaries isnt as major at 12.0 because lot of other tanks also get good gun handling and mobility.
Take away the advantage of mobility and gun handling, and what are you left with? 10.7 armor scheme, mid reload and KEW.
They changed their model in the game, and now they occupy half of the fighting compartment, while everyone else has this ring to fall into, it’s great luck
What makes the Leo 2A4 so good at 10.7 is its overall versatility, the same thing the 2A4M has
And other nations have equivalent autoloader turret modules for example
Which comes from its much better gun handling and mobility over its contemporaries; unlike 2A4CAM which has the same mobility and gun handling but now regularly faces enemies with same mobility and gun handling.
but if you get hit by an autoloader, it can respond and go into cover for repairs, and you usually sit with the turret to the side like a target and can’t respond