Why thank me, thank God and Gaijin.
There is absolutely nothing Divine about how Naval Aimbot ruined the game mode. That’s just pandering to the lowest common denominator. 🤷 It’s where we’re at though.
I just hope gaijin remembers about how the community hated this change when they made it when they again wonder why nobody is playing Naval.
The horrific AI aim change and their doubling down and focusing on big boring ships that don’t move and don’t fire very fast.
5 Likes
Maybe it’s a punishment for your sins? Do you abused M-802 and Moffet?
Doesn’t seems like nobody to me.
Lololol hold on. I need to get a microscope to read those numbers.
2 Likes
I think it meant to say that it abuses the M-802(4.3) with the Moffet(5.3) ever since the BR for the M-802 got unjustifiably bumped from 3.7 up to 4.3 But why it would try hypocritically accuse about that here I have no clue. One can only imagine it is trying to generate hate to, I dunno, “build a case?”
I’m just waiting for the day we can choose to aim properly again.
Sooner rather than later please <3
First thing I am doing when it is added/fixed is going to go see how manual aim holds out VS mindless aimbot clickers - that will be so much fun!
1 Like
Poor, innocent M-802 it meant no harm - with it boat respawn, DD damage model, good torps, fast reload 105, tons of AA, time fused HE, how could they nerf him with HE rework and BR increase on top of new aiming.
As I said before, aiming hurt abusers the most, so some of them just strait up boycott the game. Cause now some new player actually killing them, right on time when they saw them. Baw waw people gather up lets mourn. Don’t forget that Scharnhorst now not the top dog, sob.
Don’t worry I am sure they will change it back just as they did Prinz.
Please stop saturating the thread like every thread I have seen you in.
Sharing opinions and facts are welcome,
Repeating yourself constantly, spamming, arguing for the sake of arguing, trolling and attacking people is not welcome anywhere in this forum.
The best thing to do if you don’t like something or someone, is ignore them.
Which I will continue to do.
The Auto Aim Ai in NAB be cannot ignored.
For most other games aimbot is a bannable offense.
You are not allowed aimbot in Arcade ground nor air WT,
I hope that they never implement it there neither unless they wish to kill those game modes also.
5 Likes
Change what? To be imbalanced for years again?
That’s rough for sure, that you need play this ship smart now.
btw. Is that your argument, bring imbalance back, or you never come back?
You and other posters kinda blind to “opinions and facts” don’t you think?
Here is fact, WT not other games, it’s WT and it has this new aiming mechanic, which proofed itself okayish, deal with it.
ps. That’s one of your and not only your problems - demanding “right” discussion from others, while not doing it right by yourself
1 Like
Eh… I really dont think it would be that hard, given that the alternative aiming mode is fully funtional still in game in NRB. Im sure it would actually be fairly trivial to just have the aiming mode switch based upon a setting. Heck, you can switch between entire controls mode in ARB via a keybind, and thats a more significant change than aiming modes.
I think its just a lack of interest to implement such a setting. I can think of many times where gaijin added something or changed something and it was a change for all, or just implemented poorly. Like it more than a year to get a keybind toggle for secondary guns with primary guns thing
2 Likes
1 Like
Please add a like to my reply on the new community update thread if you agree/would like an option to choose your aiming method in Naval Arcade battles:
EDIT: Great reply to my post, from the same thread: Community Update No.8: Responses and What’s Coming! - #513 by Bombe18
1 Like
New automated damage control system sounds just as bad if not worse than the last “automatic” changes they made to Navy. Especially if they yet again don’t give us the choice between automatic and manual.
1 Like
A dev (moderator? Someone with some sort of power) said we could stick to the current system. I just don’t remember the specific thread in the forums.
As for the current aiming; it’s [supposed] to increase ranged accuracy but anyone with a functioning brainstem can also abuse the new aiming system to be borderline untouchable past 10km in CLs and even some CAs.
It isn’t so bad against battleships but throttle evading is pretty damn annoying.
2 Likes
It must have been hard to see that message, I failed to notice it sorry.
Oh joy.
Sounds like a mindless clicker - they might as well make it a 100% idle game
More people would “play” it.
1 Like
I may have misinterpreted the message as I came across it again.
Specifically; it wasn’t entirely a yes or no, just that we could ‘opt out’. The new damage control change - bluntly put - is nothing short of below room temperature intelligence.
It’s a genuinely baffling system that shouldn’t have [ever] been thought up and it will genuinely kill interest in Naval for me.
2 Likes
Probably why some speculated it was deliberate.
Kill it off so you don’t have to allocate resources to it.
1 Like
Which makes no sense if they’re adding new ships alongside it.
Recycling Premium Vehicles and Packages will always be main priority as it’s a quick cash grab with minimal work input.