hold on, alvis said the opposite so it’s true guys @Vamilad close the thread razervon the gaijin glazer spoke.
Hmmm? Interesting straw man.
Also weird of you to continue to attack everyone that criticizes your precious game.
Keep defending War Thunder from our critiques. ;)
This topic is about Patriot, which isn’t needed. IDK what USA can receive, but it ain’t Patriot.
Also Razer isn’t here.
The difference is the amount of complains from each side. US mains, unlike soviet/russians, are always complaining for X or Y reason.
Examples:
M829A3 WHEN, GAIJIN?
AGM-114L???
WHERE ARE THE SPALL LINERS FOR THE ABROMZ?
F-20 TO 11.7 and so on.
1 Like
I would love to see a video of how you accomplished that.
What is there for a USSR player to complain about exactly?
Last time there was legitimate reason to whine was when the F-14 was added without a counterpart for anyone else.
3 Likes
The F-20 to 11.7 makes sense when all its analogues are 11.7, and some are 11.3.
But that goes to this topic:
F-20 is fine where it is the entire BR range should be moved up with 13.0 added
Until the last patch, lack of proper multirol aircrafts or a top tier striker.
I must have missed where the SU-25T was disabled ingame.
i reported that as off-topic because it is, but of course gaijin hasn’t taken it down because it’s not RuSSians complaining
yeah sure, a modest CAS, the only SPAA this new missile doesn’t have stand-off range against: the Pantsir. It’s superior
You mean the subsonic striker without thermal TGP that was/is useless on half the maps because of the fog? Not exactly a good example.
Missiles, unlike GBUs, can be intercepted with any SACLOS SPAA.
yeah just intercept it dud ha lol ? You’re not even arguing with me. And gbu’s can be intercepted now they changed it recently.
@vKALiBUR
And now you’re calling War Thunder’s critics “apologists”.
Dude, stop attacking everyone that criticizes War Thunder. Critics aren’t gaslighting, critics know the scientific process.
Pantsir is tied with ITO-90M and TOR-M1, it’s not superior in anything other than anti-drone and anti-helicopter range.
And NATO has stand-off weapons on supersonic platforms for over a year.
F-16C is still vastly superior CAS than Su-25SM3.
There’s a reason I’m not getting the new Su-25.
I mean, if you can intercept the missiles at any range it doesn’t matter if it can travel 10km or 100km; there nothing to argue in that regard.
Believe it or not thermals doesn’t look through that heavy cloud cover either. You also can’t lock any of your guided munitions through it, which means having really heavy direct attack rockets is the better choice when you have a 3KM engagement window.
The difference between being in SPAA range / not in SPAA range.
Also, while the ability to intercept guided munitions is a nice change the limited amount of ammo given to top tier SPAAs and the inability to rearm from a safe position makes it rather irrelevant to the battle overall when aircraft can freely return and rearm in ~15 seconds.
1 Like
@vKALiBUR
Well, keep calling Americans and WT critics bots if you want.
We’ll keep critiquing War Thunder to progress its continual improvement.
this. Latest roadmap update did say they were bringing new zones for SPAA to replenish. I just hope that it isn’t marked on the map ie normal spawns rn