This is LOS at 60° not at 0°, in game at those conditions is 762mm
1 Like
aight still quite a loss from the current round we have in game
Literally what I wrote though?
I was answering the other guy, just used your comment as reference
I didnt see that, my bad.
1 Like
knowing gaijin they will never change dm53 pen rip
How do you come to that result :clueless:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1aylCMFDKVtI
Developer’s response:
The document does not explicitly state that the DM53 uses an alloy with a density of 18.5 g/cm3. Furthermore, with such a density, a 23 x 685 mm cylinder would weigh 5.27 kg, which is impossible since the weight of this projectile in flight is 5 kg, and it is worth considering that the tracer, fins, and ballistic tip also have some weight.
Surely they dont have wrong sizes for that round
5kg seem precise a bit wounldt be suprised if they only rounded the number so it fit more in page, would make sense that the round would be 5.27
CR3 should have it too
1 Like
Literally just 2a7V and 2a7HU and chally 3 but I think we’ll get more soon
Leopard 2a6EX, 2e 2a6HE :pray:
All 3 don’t have l55a1. And I don’t think 2E will come since it has no place currently
was just listing export variants :) that i know of
sure added as an export variant is completly valid
Yea but Germany already had pretty much the exact same thing lmao it’s not needed
DM63 would be a massive buff for the CR3TD, enough to justify it being above 11.3
Dm63 would be worse tho lmao
challenger 3 fights with massive suriveability issues, it would be a buff in that sense
The pen is marginally worse (would still likely be one of the top shells though as the pen loss is only like 10-15mm i think), but the ammo would be innert, making it much harder to destroy. For a tank like the CR3TD, with no armour, no spall liners and no blow out panels. It would help a lot with mitigating the constant 1HKs.
Your assuming gajin understand the concept of innert munitions