but 791mm is way more than the curret 653mm of our current dm53 and if they are still using almost the same shit why a big change
791 is los at 60°
talking about flat rates
Density, currently gajin uses 17500kg/m^3
But the likely correct density for german ammunition is 18500kg/m^3
not like gajin believes us
so thats why the pen is lower?
Less temperature dependent (i.e. lower difference in Muzzle-Velocity, which increases hit probability due to having the ballistics-calculations eased) and lower dispersion due to lower pressure discrepancies.
And most likely, just as DM 63, lower barrel-wear.
Idk if I have a similar presentation for DM 73 but as you can see above, I have one for DM 63.
Note: Muzzle-Velocity figures are for L/44, ref.:
1 Like
Something Something not possible…
of the game implemented round ? yes
1 Like
This is LOS at 60° not at 0°, in game at those conditions is 762mm
1 Like
aight still quite a loss from the current round we have in game
Literally what I wrote though?
I was answering the other guy, just used your comment as reference
I didnt see that, my bad.
1 Like
knowing gaijin they will never change dm53 pen rip
How do you come to that result :clueless:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1aylCMFDKVtI
Developer’s response:
The document does not explicitly state that the DM53 uses an alloy with a density of 18.5 g/cm3. Furthermore, with such a density, a 23 x 685 mm cylinder would weigh 5.27 kg, which is impossible since the weight of this projectile in flight is 5 kg, and it is worth considering that the tracer, fins, and ballistic tip also have some weight.
Surely they dont have wrong sizes for that round
5kg seem precise a bit wounldt be suprised if they only rounded the number so it fit more in page, would make sense that the round would be 5.27
CR3 should have it too
1 Like
Literally just 2a7V and 2a7HU and chally 3 but I think we’ll get more soon
Leopard 2a6EX, 2e 2a6HE :pray:
All 3 don’t have l55a1. And I don’t think 2E will come since it has no place currently