Whats wrong with USA teams all of a sudden?

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
1

Idk what in the hell happen to the teams for the USA, I keep getting trash teams left and right. You want examples? Here:

  1. Teammates all dying either by tk’ing, crashing into the ground or getting killed by the enemies in just 2 seconds after merging
  2. I see a heck ton of Anti-bias towards the USA, like compression, g-forces, and performance. Wth is going on with the performances? Everything in the U.S is nerfed to the floor
  3. I saw tons of planes that shouldn’t have the performance, like F-84G going 1000km/hr??? And MiG-15 out-diving a Sabre???

Look, I didn’t do this out of rage, but there are serious problems that need to be fixed.

1 Like
2

and yet they are getting Aim-120C5s for the F-15E whilst most nations are not getting an equal?

4 Likes
3

You can perfectly blame that on the premium culture around the US air tech tree, as it historically had/has strong premiums which doesn’t help on developing a proper learning curve other than the in-game raw basics, leaving aside concepts like situational awareness, energy management, etc. You get me.

I wouldn’t say there’s that heck ton? However, there’s some finnicky stuff, but there’s also finnicky stuff almost on any other nation. The amount of conveniences has always been an Achilles heel on Gaijin’s development of tech trees and meta shifts.

Meh. While top tier (13.7-14.0) could arguably feel somewhat underwhelming (F-15s being a noticeable exception), the rest of the tree has been well treated lately, like with some of the BR changes, the introduction of the Hornets.

Welp, early jets are not my area of expertise performance-wise, i know how to play them, but i don’t know their historical capabilites, so no comment.

Like sure, but i’d suggest you better start learning to deal with it instead, and i’m being terribly honest with you when im saying that it’s more likely that you’ll learn to cope about it than they are willing to fix most of the systemic issues.

4

Thats just how US mains are.

They have the most handheld air tree but claim anti-US bias the second their plane doesnt out perform enemies in every aspect.

6 Likes
5

Almost died when I readed this: Compression is affecting everyone specially larger tech trees like USA, Germany and USSR.

This is no exclusive. G-forces, what do you mean by that? Like gravity is fighting against USA specifically? Last thing US have is nerf, since most of their players doesn’t perform very well which Gaijin makes no change.

The F-15E being one of the best if not the best airplane in-game doesn’t surprise me, since its addition there’s no other plane capable like it, even the F/A-18 that is the most recent addition to the USA tech tree can’t be compared to it.

1 Like
7

Try switching to EU servers. It worked extremely well for me in ground, but idk about air.

1 Like
8

technically it never has been and wont be after patch because f15i is objectively better due to extra countermeasures

however even just practically EFT and ravioli were added less than a month latter and both are significantly better than f15e

9

What is it, like 60 extra? Not really that big of a difference IMO.

10

yeah its not a huge difference, thats why I added the technicality, pretty much never comes up

2 Likes
11

This isn’t a new phenomenon.

Completely the opposite in air RB. US stuff is either undertiered, or is pushed down to lower BRs because the players aren’t good enough to use them right.

Just because one plane can out dive another, doesn’t mean it will in every single situation.

1 Like
12

Rafale C F3 handles very good at short distances but I don’t see any F-15E sane user going at short distances against a MICA-EM, Eurofighter-2000 in other hand, seems to have some issues pointed by the community specially regarding the radar,

Their weapons, is absolute the same (AIM-120B and AIM-9M at the best, maybe the F-15E could get the AIM-9X I’ll be surprised) to the F-15E, when having a better radar performance in-game, makes the F-15E practically better than the Eurofighter-2000.

13

thanks for confirming you have never played top tier air rb

there is no other way you would say that

1 Like
14

No, honestly; I don’t know how to exactly handle ARH, SARH missiles, nor radar. If you take a time to check my profile, you see my terrible stats on higher battle rating vehicles.

15

yeah so why are you mentioning vehicles you have no experience with?

1 Like
16

Data in-game, replays and, sounds stupid from how much time I died to a specific vehicle, or is it fine the F-15E for example having a good selection of weapons such like the AIM-120B getting a better missile?

It’s like the Su-27SM having the R-77 and out of nowhere Gaijin adds the R-77-1 without any penalties like battle rating changes, and I wanted to know your position regarding my comment, is it so anything that I said wrong? It may be a good sign for myself step outside of air battles discussions.

17

American mains being bad post #2482681

18

the big thing to note the two worst 14.0s (at least according to the metrics gaijin uses that we have data for) are f18C and F15e/i by a significant margin

and those two are the ones getting a possibly improved missile next patch to try balance the 14.0 br range

19

So my guess, is it ok for the AIM-120C-5 come to the game for balancing reasons? Despite the F-15E being a huge flying chunk never seen it as a bad vehicle. The Rafale in comparison is way too good for its own, you can’t fly low and keep higher speeds, but the maneuverability is awesome.

20

Those planes are the best, not our fault that Americans are so bad at the game that they need to buff the most brain-dead easy jets to use

21

Honestly, they should give the current missiles their irl performance first. The more missiles we add, the worst any changes to the current ones will be.

You dont understand. The p47 needs to be 2.7 because i cant turn fight zeros in it.