What is worng with US toptier ground?
The players
What is worng with US toptier ground?
The players
Bingo
so if im correct, us top tier is kinda goeted?
Yes it is pretty damn strong mate.
You’ve got reliable MBTs, one of, if not the best light tank in game.
Banging Helicopter with the AH64E which I do not use myself
good SPAA with in the CLAWS system.
Good decent cas too.
Hell that match just there I got 2 kills wth GBU8’s on an F16A

should i grnd sweden?
That is entirely up to you.
I haven’t ground them in a while and haven’t got past rank 6 I think it is.
I’ve personally been working on Isreal, France, Germany, USA and russia all to top tier air and ground recently.
Great MBTs, one of the best lights, one of the best Helis, Great CAS, decent AAs, Most nations have a distinct weak area (eg Russia w/ MBTs, Germany with CAS + Helis, Japan with Lights + AA, etc.) but US’ weakest vehicles are still solid.
us or swedenn? and can i count a nation fisisd? i have inn us hstvl, and all abrams to m1a2. so i have agood lineup, i dont have the 3 last viacles of us. doesnt it still count that im done?
Only if the enemy has a skill issue.
The Abrams is already incredibly easy to one shot kill, added bonus is that in the rare case it survives a shot it will generally have no turret ring and engine.
Don’t get me wrong they are solid, hell I think they are great, but I wouldn’t call them that survivable.
Depends on your definition. I didn’t consider myself done with Japan until I got all TT + Squadron Helicopters, Ground and Air.
As in what’s better? For top tier,
Sweden has better MBTs, Lights and AA. They severely lack in Helis and have worse CAS. So if you only play Ground, then Sweden is one of the best choices. It isn’t as big as a tree as the US and is almost always good at any lineup, but Helicopters and Air is an issue.
well, im not an air player, but i like cas. For me its not anyoying, but i think sweden has some cas now, the new f16m and f18c late, with agm, and sweden ground i an see form 8.0 it good. My definition for a nation finish is: in your favorite viacle, to the top done with it top br.
Forgot about that ^^
CAS I still would say is arguably worse than the US but good. The F-15E has more armament and can overwhelm AA a lot easier than the F-16AM + F-18C MLU2. The only thing that the F-16AM has over the F-16C + F-15E is a MAWS.
That’s the same as literally any tank in game man.
I catagorically disagree with abrams, maybe it’s how I play it but I tend to survive getting shot unless it’s a blatant shot, which would take out any MBT.
As is every top tier MBt if you’ve any ability to aim.
After coming back to em from the Merkavas, leclercs and T series, the abrams feel wayy more survivable.
In my experiences my leclercs have been more survivable, hell even the challenger 2s when I play them.
However if I face them all 3 just generally die quickly, although I prefer facing a hull down Abrams over a hull down Chally, as the abrams is somewhat easy to ammorack when hull down.
EDIT: I agree that the M1A2 is seriously undertiered at 12.0 and that the M1A1 HCs should lose M829A2 for M829A1 to stay at 12.0, but I think the Abrams survivability is generally overhyped.
Or in my eyes they could convert it to the SEP V3 like they did with the CV90105 TML, except not bringing it (V2) back?
They are survivable in the sense that sometimes you will only lose basket + 1 crew, or basket + 2 crew, being able to retreat (sometimes fire back), and repair behind your team (while they last).
I don’t get how people can whiff on the Abrams so badly. As long as I have the top dart on a tank I even one shot or turret basket + engine them even when I take super poor shots.
Then again I guess the average WT casual player is kind of special.
CR2 can be absolutely nuked through teh top of the turret RN it’s effectively useless even hull down :(
CR2s aren’t bad for survivability the issue is they just ger breached and whittled down.
They couldn’t do that in the past is my point the crew would take the spall now it a tleast has a chance