What if War Thunder gave everyone the same tank budget?

Imagine a mode where your lineup is built around the real-world cost of your tanks. Let’s say an M1A2 SEP V3 costs around $20 million, a Leopard 2A6V around $28 million, and a ZTZ99A around $5 million.

Everyone gets the same total budget. Bring expensive tanks and you get fewer respawns. Pick cheaper ones and you can respawn more often, as long as you stay within that budget. You’d probably need more crew slots too. I’m sure Gaijin would love that part lol.

It could recreate that WWII trade-off: one finely built Tiger costing roughly as much as three to five much simpler T-34s. Do you put your money into a few expensive tanks, or bring more affordable ones and fight with numbers?

I’d love to see what players choose. Would they go for the Leopard 2 or Abrams for their refinement and how they feel to play? Or pick cheaper T-90Ms and T-80s so they can keep coming back?

A system like this could bring the economic side of warfare into the game and add a whole new layer of decisions. I think there’s a lot of potential here for both realism and more interesting gameplay.

Long winded way to delete the US tree post 1950.

1 Like

At higher BRs thats just gunna favour nations that mass produce tanks and thus have a lower overall unit cost than nations that build fewer overall.

1 Like

Fair point lol. I want expensive tanks to mean fewer spawns, not an empty US queue. If straight real-world prices make it that bad, the budgets would need adjusting. I’d try it as a separate mode first anyway.

Yeah, that’s a fair concern. Cheaper tanks getting more spawns is part of the idea, but if they’re just as capable, it becomes a straight advantage. Real prices could be a starting point, with adjustments for balance. I want “quality vs numbers” to be a meaningful choice, not one obvious winner.

would be a funny LTM. especially if the budget was for the whole team. would be an instant loss if someone spawns an Ajax because that thing as of when they were withdrawn from service has cost about £19 million per unit. Considering a challenger 1 at the same BR cost about £2 million that would instantly cripple the team

Imagine losing the match in the spawn menu lol. “Who ordered the Ajax? That was our entire tank budget!”

A shared team budget sounds fun for an LTM, though I’d probably give each player their own budget so one guy can’t bankrupt everyone.

1 Like

If we’re comparing tanks one on one, the Abrams and Leopard 2 are clearly strong picks, so naturally more players will choose them. Cheaper tanks tend to be less capable, so fewer people want to play them. It’s not that cheap tanks are bad. A tank like the T-34 had an advantage in cost, but that advantage doesn’t really translate into the game.

7.7 in shambles as a squad tries to spawn a maus.

“Repair the transmission or spawn another tank?”
“Neither. We’re applying for a loan.” lol

2 Likes

Real combat costs money too, after all. Gaijin would love that part. Going to war without even looking at the budget? That’s not very realistic lol.

And I’m pulling up in an m60, regardless of the br

image
Counter arguement.