Game Modes.
War Thunder needs a more long form game mode outside of Sim. Maybe thats some form of RB EC or Arena Mode or just something that isn’t a 10 minute TDM.
This game has so much potential to be an exciting combat sandbox but right now we’re stuck with game modes that have barely changed since the beta.
War Thunder is like being given the keys to a whole lineup of Ferrari’s but only being allowed to drive them around a cramped parking lot. It’s War Thunders biggest issue.
So the major update that was already announced to be happening.
Also it’s 10/10 countries that have fallen behind, not 9.
Don’t forget Coastal & Naval
Well if we think of it as a race to the best SPAA in the world Russia is currently in the lead. So technically he is right for saying 9/10
I really hope that a mod will be added for tanks only without planes or helicopters.
IRL isn’t in-game though.
I was meaning if you compare it to the best spaa in the world. Russia in game is the closet so 9/10 would be behind some farther than others though.
10/10 are behind CAS in SPAA.
Saying otherwise is propaganda.
I would say the Pantsir is on pair with other nations CAS. (this excludes weapons like the 38MT because it is on the same team.)
I agree we need more advance SPAA for all nations however I was saying the nation that doesn’t need it as much as others is Russia. But I think that shouldn’t exclude Russia from further SPAA being added. However I also believe if we get more advanced SPAA like the SLAMRAAM-ER Humvee with 9X’s we’ll need more advance A2G capabilitie.
1- lolno Literally the best gamemode ever invented. Thank you DICE.
2- More no. Hating CQC maps is fine, but most of us want full realism which means diversity of map size, not specific map sizes.
3- I see, you prefer arcade. I support arcade mode being ground only.
4- More no. Are you anti-fun? There’s no reason to oppose player controlled SPGs.
Yes and No I agree with the only CQB maps being removed, but I think there should still be parts of maps that have that option. They need to be way bigger but the buildings add good cover for points.
Having bigger maps will also allow for more indirect fire from SPH allowing them to stay in the game too. Also the bigger the map the harder it is for an aircraft to find you.
Honestly I think bigger maps will solve all
those problems lol.
Thank you for your input Alvis. Your disagreements are noted as they are intended - to marginalize any opinion other than your own. Have a nice day.
The community’s.*
My views in this topic come from the majority opinions in the community, not me.
None of the takes in my post are created by me, but thousands of other players that I agree with and represent my views.
Removing CQC maps is unrealistic nonsense.
Same as removing large maps.
I agree about the bigger maps. Having, say, small villages on a big map would be ok but these pure CQB maps are just ridiculous. Some people have fun with that but I look at those maps as purely “send in the infantry and Brumbars.” The SP arty issue is that they are included in the game as TD’s. Although many have anti-armor capability IRL they were never intended to be used as such, only either 1) anti-armor indirect fire from MILES beyond the range (direct fire) of their targets, and 2) defense against vehicles that penetrated forward defenses.
Have a nice day Alvis, Oh Great Authority Speaker for the Community. All hail The Speaker!
I feel like it would be more fun to use SPHs in an indirect fire role.
I think this would be ok, much like WoT, but I think there could be a choice (however it’s implemented) of off-map or on-map indirect fires. But hey, these are ideas, right?
@FahrtWahrk I am not the community nor represent the community.
Their views represent me, as I said in the post you replied to.
WoT has artillery be OP.
WT has never had OP artillery.
Nah, they’re cool and often better designed than larger maps.