Are you going to be like that other guy who claimed you can use echolocation to find a plane flying in circles within a kilometer-tall cloud as an “adaption”?
Tell me, oh wise man of the internet, how would you find someone camping inside this cloud and denying an A point? They have 8x8x1 kilometer of space they can hide within to still affect the objective.
Or sticking to RB:
How do you intend to see the enemy aircraft so that you can actually hit them in these conditions? The red marker doesn’t tell you their attitude and you kind of need that to dogfight and hit someone other than sitting on their tail. And even if you do get to use the red marker… Amazing, playing a WW2/korean war dogfight to click on red nameplates.
1 Like
I get it, you dont want to work, you just want decisive engagements every time with little effort.
You are only thinking of what is good for you with little acknowledgment to others desires or needs, i see it all the time.
Give me an actual answer rather than grandstanding and offering as much substance as a politician doing fund raising.
1 Like
DEAL WITH IT.
or
Play a game where you click a button and win.
“sorry commander, I am denying your request to engage because there is light drizzle, aborting engagement, I prefer engagement methods that are beneficial to both me and my enemy to put us on equal standing rather than utilising what is available to my own benefit depending on my method”
How about refining your methods rather than complaining about bloody clouds like they are some kind of unexpected phenomenon.
"Enemy has 10hp more than me, there is light rain, temp too high, I dont like sun, my dog stepped on a bee. . . . . . "
This literally happened?
Allies abused the fact that clouds travelled with their bomber formations to prevent axis single-engine interceptors from taking off.
Give me a bloody answer or find a sewer to stink up.
You are in this position:
You are contesting an A point, which ranges roughly 8 kilometers north, 8 kilometers east and there’s a 1-2 kilometer thick cloud cover over the entire A point.
You notice that the objective is neither being captured or lost. You dive below the cloud cover to find your opponent.
There’s nobody here.
So you climb through the clouds to search above, knowing you must be under roughly 5 kilometer altitude to affect the capture point.
Nothing.
You dive under the cloud.
Nothing.
You climb over the cloud.
Nothing.
Meanwhile, there’s 1 guy who trimmed their plane to fly in permanent circle at 1.3 kilometers altitude along the circumference of the objective forever.
You spend a good 5-10 minutes looking for them and the objective is about to expire.
How would you find this guy?
1 Like
wtf you doing at 5k if you wanna bomb?
Some self acknowledgment would go a long way.
Another example of the community who expect everything to be in their favour irrespective of their bad decision making.
Fucking tiresome to see this same calibre of obnoxiousness.
Who said anything about bombing?
There’s an air superiority point. It is captured by having an excess of friendly aircraft within the 8x8x5km cube of space.
1 Like
I am wasting my time with people like you. Bombing or not. The problem is you not the bloody weather.
Give me a solution.
How do you find a guy flying in permanent circles within a (1 or 2) kilometer thick cloud spanning 8x8 kilometres.
1 Like
work it out yourself.
adapt your methods.
Give me an answer or find a sewer to ruin.
1 Like
Good luck to ya.
There are tower defence games you can download on your mobile phone.
You make a claim that the issue is solvable.
If you make such a claim within any circle, you do so by backing up your argument with either evidence or at least a experiment proposal that can be attempted.
So.
You, who are so wise in the arts of flying,
elucidiate this poor eastern european mongrel
Wisen her up in the arts unknown,
act as augur and diviner in days so dark
and cast light where ignorance rules
3 Likes
I have no obligation nor do I have the ability to detract someone from their determined mindset.
Like it or lump it or adapt, personally I think it is a personal problem to overcome trivial issues and you have a preferance to make it as easy for you every single time.
You lack the ability to think outside of your immediate needs or desires or with respect to other players.
I’m sure you will get there in the end, I have faith in you to overcome clouds, I believe in you!
You made a claim.
It is customary, nay, bloody expected to either support the claim with evidence of your own, or to provide an experimental design that can be attempted to replicate and verify the claim.
Absent such, the claim should be withdrawn, ideally with an apology for wasting others’ time with mountain-lectures about nothing.
And you are less useful than the fund-raiser the drunken cousin of my country’s prime minister is holding in some random farmland retreat.
More words of substance are spoken there in a drunken exchange of “hey!” than any you have provided us.
1 Like
well shut up and deal with it.
I have confidence that you have the ability to overcome clouds . . . .
This answer imply that most bad weather enjoyers doesn’t even know how to deal it 😂
Also, You say the player base over the last few years has been terrible or whatever, but you somehow forget why night games were removed from ARB match years ago.
1 Like
