Wow, shame on us for suggesting that a vehicle is overtired in the place you’re meant to discuss vehicles.
1 Like
Both vehicles are overtiered.
That’s not a small size difference, especially from the front. The BBC will have a far easier time holding a corner since an enemy will have to drive further to see the hull.
Edit: oh I completely misunderstood your comment.
Btw, you wanna share with the class on that autocorrect Mr.Pangolin?
5 Likes
it could be 9.0 with little problem as its not super mobile like most of the bushmasters 40MPH top speed and accelrates like a medium tank
2 Likes
Im sure you know all about size differences and BBC.
“Hi, Welcome to WatchMojo, today we’ll be counting down Top 10 most unfortunate typos on Warthunder forums.”
5 Likes
Whoops, I guess I use that word too much . . .
Don’t care much about the battle rating. This thing will be bad even at 8.0.
Its just a goofy event vehicle. Play it for fun and gigges. NOT for anything “serious”.
1 Like
I felt the cv90c was pretty good, apart from the retarded way gaijin implemented the 40mm ammo storage and reloading (for some reason the loader in these vehicles won’t replenish ready rack unless the tank is idle for 10 seconds)
The lack of a stabiliser and the unreliability of the missiles on the BILL aren’t great.
Really, the best thing about the cv9030 is the ammo being in a belt.
1 Like
Which is kinda underwhelming since most other autocannons at that BR are also belt-fed (other than the Bagel).
30mm at 200 RPM is kinda mediocre, whereas something like the BMP-3’s / BMD-4’s 30mm at 330 RPM or BMP-2’s 30mm at 550 RPM / VBC (PT2)'s 25mm at 560 RPM is pretty good.
Even the Bagel’s 200 RPM is good because it shoots 57mm AP instead of 30mm APFSDS / APDS --provides way more damage even though it’s lacking volume of fire.
And all of these (other than the VBC (PT2)) have some sort of ATGM to launch at enemies at front-aspect (though the I-TOWs that the Bagel gets are kinda useless at 9.7).