Can you show me who showed it? I still have concerns.
Gaijin doesn’t just hate Chinese tanks, Gaijin just hates China faction as a whole
4 Likes
1 Like
Trickzzter or someone, Tell me where the turret basket from, show me reliable sources even a photo, prove it.
3 Likes
They are determined to continue pushing forward these unpopular changes regardless of players’ opinions: You see, here’s what they say:
Unless we unite to force them to change, everyone will become a victim of their arrogance.
Stop count the entire turret basket of the tank as part of the traverse mechanism! - Dev Server “Hornet’s Sting” / General Discussion - Dev Server - War Thunder — official forum
Now not only those vehicles that have added automatic loading machines, but also M1 and Leopard 2 series, VT5 have been hit hard. Who will be next? Anyway, this is not beneficial for players.
7 Likes
Yeah right that’s unfair at all, those M1s and Leopard 2 elctronic parts can be cancelled, basket DMs can be reducted, for VT5, only a floor can be proved, basket don’t even exist in reality, the gunner seat and commander seat are linked with turret, What the Hell with this big wall basket.
I’ve been against turret basket addition since the beginning, the game should now change its name to “Repair Thunder.”
And I got to say, They should pay more time on NERAs and spall liners, the armor can’t even block .50cal rightnow, it’s 33 tons not like 18 tons’ Sprut-SDM1.
5 Likes
You could use the photo of VT-5 instead of ZTQ-15.
The front boundary of the floor suggests there’s no turret basket.
4 Likes
2 Likes
that’s a really useful image, where it from
Someone already reported the issue with this image, if Gaijin rejects this that’ll be absurd.
rejected
he didn’t offer the source of the image, this should be a important source
1 Like
We need to know where the image came from.
The persistent pattern of technical dismissals compels us to formally request clarification on Gaijin’s stance toward Chinese military assets. Documented evidence demonstrates systematic neglect in modeling accuracy, with the majority of technical reports being categorically dismissed as “Not a Bug” without substantive analysis, while “Accepted” reports remain unimplemented indefinitely. Should institutional bias against Chinese platforms exist within your development framework, explicit acknowledgment would allow our technical community to cease unproductive documentation efforts. This operational approach contradicts fundamental principles of vehicular authenticity maintenance as practiced in contemporary combat vehicle simulation.
5 Likes
They already did that bro.
1 Like
Mediocre armor, ha
Meanwhile every VT-5 related posts claimed that its armor is capable of withstanding auto cannon fire.
3 Likes