rejected
he didn’t offer the source of the image, this should be a important source
We need to know where the image came from.
The persistent pattern of technical dismissals compels us to formally request clarification on Gaijin’s stance toward Chinese military assets. Documented evidence demonstrates systematic neglect in modeling accuracy, with the majority of technical reports being categorically dismissed as “Not a Bug” without substantive analysis, while “Accepted” reports remain unimplemented indefinitely. Should institutional bias against Chinese platforms exist within your development framework, explicit acknowledgment would allow our technical community to cease unproductive documentation efforts. This operational approach contradicts fundamental principles of vehicular authenticity maintenance as practiced in contemporary combat vehicle simulation.
They already did that bro.
Mediocre armor, ha
Meanwhile every VT-5 related posts claimed that its armor is capable of withstanding auto cannon fire.
“Mediocre armor”
“Designed only to withstand MG fire”
LMAO
Also no mention of spall liners
Wallahi we’re cooked
hope they fix it but I doubt it, hell even doubt its getting a spall liner lol
Absolutely can’t have CN receive a good tank lol
Just like the VT-4 this tank is soon going to be forgotten and gaijin is never going to fix this tank.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
They said this is simplified version for Bangladesh. Maybe it should not have all those things ZTQ-15 is having?
Even if its a simplified version it shouldn’t have worse protection than a BMP. LFP is easily penned by 12.7 HMG.
simplified front additional armor and RCWS. but shouldn’t beso weak protected.
Gaijin didn’t even bother to model the bolt on armor plates on the LFP.
I originally wanted to purchase him directly with Golden Eagle, but now it seems that waiting for 3 months is not a problem
I can’t imagine a 33T car not being able to protect .50 HGM The 30T Type 90 wheeled tank can protect against 2A42 fire, while the 33T VT5 cannot protect against .50
Cannot defend against modern tanks of .50
XD
@Miraz05 any specific data of VT-5’s size? like hull length, height or any other data can help calculating the thickness of the armor