Yeah, but are you partial enough to it to not have our stuff fixed in favour of just giving more of that?
Vextra 105: OFL 105 F1 Incorrect Penetration
These devs man… not only are they incapable of buffing any high-tier French vehicle but they’re also incapable of properly nerfing them too.
Perhaps they will now realise how anaemic OFL 105 F1.
12 Likes
Why is the already not great thing getting made even less great? Isn’t it bad enough already?
You know, when there’s a dead horse, why not just keep beating it
I was fucking hoping this thing was gonna be like Centauro 120 but france got that top tier light tank copium.
Either this thing has to get decent sabot or 5 second reload.
Without anyone of them, it’s not 9.7 material.
I guess a roundabout way of forcing the devs to give Vextra an upgrade in round.
1 Like
i mean we can get the 120mm that will actually be good just will have to wait another 2 years
6 Likes
Since reports for FCS are being acknowledged:
I present one for the Vextra 105:
Basically, within the acquisition envelope of IRIS TGS (i.e., when in gunner view), up to 15 targets would be automatically designated to the player and a ballistic solution would be provided to the player for each target. Figure 1 shows a top-down view of the acquisition envelope for the SXXI commander sight for visual purposes:
Spoiler
The diagram of the Leclerc depicted isn’t actually an SXXI. But ignore that xD
Eventually the devs will realise the Vextra has no place at 9.7 sigh
15 Likes
“We cannot verify this, not a bug”
2 Likes
I am so disappointed in gaijin not doing anything with the vextra in the coming update, it’s in such a sad state
8 Likes
Challenger 2; 97~ reports open.
Well that’s what happens when the Challenger reports are ‘this specific version has a model inaccuracy’ (the first many reports are name, optic zoom and model reports for very specific variants) and then Leclerc reports are “every single variant is missing this major future that massively effects both realism and gameplay”
9 Likes
Another reply to this because we need to keep this discussion alive, Vextra shouldn’t be artificially dragged down to a lower BR and nerfed, especially when the 9.7 area of France for light vehicles has plenty of other options, such as the AMX-10RC with the TML 105 turret.
Gaijin absolutely should move the Vextra up in BR after fixing its various problems, then work on a lineup for it, its current spot can be filled by other more deserving vehicles
2 Likes
They won’t listen. They’ve decided it should be bad, so it will be bad.
1 Like
but now we have the Leopard 2A4NL at 10.7 without a lineup.
Then we need more people to complain about it
And? They don’t care. It was never about line up, it was just to keep it artificially nerfed.
If that worked, Leclerc and Chally would be fixed.
4 Likes
People give up too easily on those, eventually the reply chains fall quiet
We dont have that yet so it isnt a valid point. On 9.7 vectra has a lineup, no need to ruin it. It is better to have it there in nerfed state then higher alone. If we gonna see more additions to 10 BR area this discussion would be more reasonable
Not a valid point? Suggestion is to add it, NOT give it OFL 120 F2, then put it in Vextra’s current spot
Put Vextra to 10.3, where the Tiger HAP and Super Etendard work better with it, then expand its line-up from there
It doesn’t even matter if it DOES have a 9.7 lineup, as the AMX-40 is heavily nerfed, AMX-30 ROLAND is heavily nerfed, at that point buff them all and bring them to 10.3
2 Likes
Heli and a plane do not make a lineup, tanks do. Amx 40 chassy is more in line with 9.7 tech level. On 10.3 it will be much more situational, surrounded by modern tanks with composite, era and other advancements. Again no point in destroying a solid working 9.7 lineup just to make 2 weaker lineups. When more 9.7, 10.0 and 10.3 tanks will be added the discussion about buffing vextra will be valid