Another reply to this because we need to keep this discussion alive, Vextra shouldn’t be artificially dragged down to a lower BR and nerfed, especially when the 9.7 area of France for light vehicles has plenty of other options, such as the AMX-10RC with the TML 105 turret.
Gaijin absolutely should move the Vextra up in BR after fixing its various problems, then work on a lineup for it, its current spot can be filled by other more deserving vehicles
They won’t listen. They’ve decided it should be bad, so it will be bad.
but now we have the Leopard 2A4NL at 10.7 without a lineup.
Then we need more people to complain about it
And? They don’t care. It was never about line up, it was just to keep it artificially nerfed.
If that worked, Leclerc and Chally would be fixed.
People give up too easily on those, eventually the reply chains fall quiet
We dont have that yet so it isnt a valid point. On 9.7 vectra has a lineup, no need to ruin it. It is better to have it there in nerfed state then higher alone. If we gonna see more additions to 10 BR area this discussion would be more reasonable
Not a valid point? Suggestion is to add it, NOT give it OFL 120 F2, then put it in Vextra’s current spot
Put Vextra to 10.3, where the Tiger HAP and Super Etendard work better with it, then expand its line-up from there
It doesn’t even matter if it DOES have a 9.7 lineup, as the AMX-40 is heavily nerfed, AMX-30 ROLAND is heavily nerfed, at that point buff them all and bring them to 10.3
Heli and a plane do not make a lineup, tanks do. Amx 40 chassy is more in line with 9.7 tech level. On 10.3 it will be much more situational, surrounded by modern tanks with composite, era and other advancements. Again no point in destroying a solid working 9.7 lineup just to make 2 weaker lineups. When more 9.7, 10.0 and 10.3 tanks will be added the discussion about buffing vextra will be valid
Again, youre not paying attention at all. AMX-40 could perform great at 10.3 with its composite armor its missing, as well as the ammo having massively underperforming penetration, it would be too strong at 9.7 with those accuracy fixes
Do that with the Vextra, and you get a 10.3 vehicle
Fix the Roland and you get yet another great 10.3 option
9.7 in France is made ENTIRELY of vehicles that are massively nerfed to fit that BR. It shouldn’t be in need of more 10.3s. France should have 10.3s in the vehicles already added, and in need of 9.7.
AMX-40 could perform great at 10.3 with its composite armor its missing
My report regarding this recently got accepted, along with my other report about the AMX-40’s ready rack being incorrect.
I’d love to see the AMX-40 with it’s turret composite and a faster reload go up in BR alongside a VEXTRA 105 with it’s proper APFSDS shell.
There are a lot of other vehicles like the AMX-10RC TML that could be added to reinforce the 9.7 lineup, while the VEXTRA and AMX-40 could create a 10.3 lineup which France currently lacks.
We could also get the AMX-10RC T40. uses the CTA 40mm from EBRC Jagur and HOT-3 atgm.
Not gonna lie that would probably be something that would better suit a 10.7 France lineup (assuming that thing is stabilized because iirc the early EBRC turrets are not)
Clicked I have the same issue on these to maybe help
Is there also a report open about its apparently massively underperforming shell? I saw that it should have a lot more penetration but not sure where it was last
Also more 10.3s could be the funny Cockerill 3105s, since those are actually pretty unique to an extent and would be a nice use of Belgium
Add a vexta(late) and do all the extras for, idk what aside from a better round tho. Still hoping they add the AMX10Rc (TML105) one day tho
Amx10rc my beloved
Already in game
I really dont understand why they didnt go for it instead. It would fit much better to 9.7 and also be easier for them to make.
And Vextra now sits at BR where it doesnt really belong and as a cherry on top now there is also alone 2a4 without any line up at 10.7 that nobody asked for.