It’s just a matter of time before they realise that it can fix lots and lots of line-up problems
Unlike Stryker,the Vextra is actually mobile and with good reverse speed. So it can flank much better so worse round is not an issue. Its light tank after all and even the F1 allows it to frontally take on 11.7 MBTs into the same areas you would be shooting with F2,M900,3BM60,DM53 or whatever other round. And if you flank then nothing matters as you penetrate the sides easily.
2 Likes
not every map allows you to flank to the levels your talking about and just because you can the vextra should not be held to a double standard just because it can flank
1 Like
Sure if you you take penetration in a vacuum. You should know by now that you need to look at the big picture when comparing tanks.
The Vextra is about 50% heavier (assuming no one is stupid enough to take the add on armor on their M1128) than the M1128 while having twice as much engine HP. The difference in mobility between the 2 is massive.
Currently the Vextra is around the same level of capabilities as the VRCC and Centauro ROMOR. Adding F2 would make it significantly better than those 2, meaning it should definitely get a BR increase.
You dont have to flank 1km away around map edge tho. Like lets take Alaska as example,can pretty much flank through the city using various shortcuts between houses nd such nd waiting for enemies to pass by. One example could be between A and B between the skyscrapers,idr the square name rn.
Both vehicles has similiar reverse speed while Stryker has crewless turret, commander thermals and much better firepower.
At least the check the stats before making statements.
Vextra does have better mobility overall, adding F2 shell will surely make it worthy for 10.3
2 Likes
They were comparing a hypothetical vextra with F2 to a M1128 and that the vextra with F2 ehould have a similar or higher BR rhan the M1128.
Spanish was on the other side of the argument thinking that a hypothetical Vextra with F2 was fine at 9.7.
1 Like
Nah thats not okay.
Vextra should be 10.0 with F2 at least, 10.3 will be much better tho.
Keeping Vextra 105 at 9.7 with F1 shell is the real crime tbh.
11 Likes
At dev the Vextra was reversing 60 km/h,that is definitely not speed Stryker could reverse at.
1 Like
Currently it has 12.8km reverse speed, just checked last night.
1 Like
Well i havent looked at it at live,so apologies.
1 Like
No worries.
1 Like
First of all thank you for the inside you provided us it makes it much easier for us understand the decisions devopers make and we can express our opinion about it much better.
But to the point.
If this was what developers wanted to achieve i dont really understand why they picked Vextra then. On paper it is not a 9.7 vehicles and aperentaly they see it too so i dont really understand the choice of vehicle when there is amx-10 TML which fits that BR much better than Vextra.
This is good and understandable but the part i dont get here is that developers dont add whole line ups of 4-5 vehicles for one nation in a single update so naturally even if they add a new vehicle there and move Vextra to it there still wont be any real line up plus 9.7 line up will be weakened.
I think Vextra should be represented in its full potential as it is standard in the game thus it can support 11.7 line up better while it prepares the ground for the 10.3/7 line up.
7 Likes
I was pretty sure i saw 10kmish value but seems like i didnt remember the exact value.
Slighlty better then M1128.
1 Like
Would also note the turret of the Vextra is significantly easier to hit than the stryker.
3 Likes
Agreed, not to mention that tiger hap, super etandard and jaguar are all 10.3/0. Take away those, current 9.7 “line up” has nothing. I just think 10.3 will have much more potential.
2 Likes
I have a question, is the -6/15 degree elevation angle currently possessed by the Vextra 105 correct? I got it today, and was greatly disappointed after the initial experience. The combination of the rear turret and -6 degree depression angle is very difficult to use, it’s hard to aim at the enemy except in urban terrain. The AMX10RC, which uses a similar turret and 105 gun, has a -8/20 degree elevation angle, and the once existed CV90105TML has a -7/20 degree elevation angle. In the internal structure view, the breech at the maximum depression angle still has a lot of recoil space.
1 Like
I played a few more games last night and the vextra and it more or less confirmed my suspicion, the vextra although being a great platform (with some issues) suffers a lot because of the 8.7 dart, 9.7 as everyone know gets sucked into 10.0 games almost constantly, and at 10.0-10.7 BR ranges you start to see a lot of T-80U platforms which the OFL 105 F1 has a lot of difficulties penetrating.
I still stand firm that the vextra should recieve the OFL 105 F2 and stay at 9.7 as that will make killing well armored vehicles just that much easier making this vehicle more viable.
2 Likes
I’m far away from it right now as I’m grinding air but +1 from me.
AFAIK there are plenty potential 10.3 additions to france ground so idk, this could set the good baseline for it.
1 Like