you know what, your right.
he might just not understand
can you do that when you have heavy mbt with no stab ? please do show me mister french main.
no shit lmao
I just unlocked some WoT memories lol, yeh, they would be nice
Yes ok it’s called balance
Amazing fire power, crappy, very crappy armor. Balanced
BMPT => amazing fire power, amazing armor, ammo box if you run out of your amazing fire power, good mobility as well, biased russian team and their biased vehicles backing you up, … pretty balanced as well ngl
german mains are crap. REALLY crap.
doesnt take away from the average german main having the same amount of neurons as a beetle
1 Like
Russian bias doesnt exist, u can just blame gaijin for the volumetric problem, also bmpt72 is balanced right now, the only one that is a problem is the bmpt t90
Ayo,im 50% german main and im not a professional,but im good at the game xd
Well,sometimes i feel like my german team mates are pretty blind,but just that xd
Comparing turm or t58 with BMPT is straight dishonesty
People been complaining a lot about BMPT, saying as far as it destroys entire brackets from 10.3 to 13.0 GRB. People didn’t and still don’t complain as much about t58 and turm.
You take them to higher BRs, they become crappy tanks, you know. Also, I’m sure you noticed those are premium vehicles while BMPT isn’t.
T58 can one shot bmpt
Bro we talked about it already, you can’t homogenize a whole population saying all german players are crap. Under what rule, what makes them magically crap compared to others ?
If we go that way, I can tell Germany is primarly played by german people, and that german people are among the most intelligent people worldwide with their german quality technology and all, so they must be the most clever players ingame as well. It’s absurd.
Russian bias doesnt exist
also bmpt72 is balanced
Oh boy
And thank God for that, because even 12.7 MBTs can’t.
And im saying that as a US main
U can use the fv4005 or the m109, they somehow also kill the bmpt with a one shot lol xD
no.
saying that this exact nation is baised and make a whole personality about it is straight dishonesty to the players and the game itself.
other nation also got ultra powerfull premium vehicules but you ignore them simple because your baised.
2 Likes
fine.
the overwhelming majority of german mains are trash beyond all belief
lol not really. nations are played by all. Its what the nation offers thats attracting certain people
ah yes the wundewaffe nation. Who lost, to the technological superiority of the British and Americans and industrial superiority of the United States.
1 Like
ITT: ppl compete to have the worst takes on vehicles they haven’t played
saying that this exact nation is baised […] is straight dishonesty
Ok so as a reminder of why russian bias exists (non-exhaustive list) :
- Spikes/MMPs are broken (gotta love hitting commander MG 2 times in a row, a cannon then 6 ERAs eating the ATGM) ;
- NATO MBT armors being paper compared to reality and russian MBTs ingame ;
- NATO MBTs getting nerfed to the ground (turret basket and electronics everywhere now, except the Arietes I think. We’re still waiting for t-series basket, maybe in 8 years we don’t know) ;
- NATO MBTs not getting their best DART (Leos, Leclercs)
- T-series model are broken (ERAs and autoloaders eat DARTs ( Russian Bias in 2026? - #1603 by SnuggyNyx , unbelievable), ERAs eat ATGMs, the whole model eat bombs ( Stalinium armor? - #684 by TROOPER7 : what is THIS seriously ??!)
- LMURs top down approach are correctly modeled, as well as their damage model => AH-64E AGMs are completely BROKEN compared to these, you usually need 2-4 missiles to destroy MBTs/SPAAs/BMPTs
- BMPTs are broken, no need to develop here
- Pantsir-S1 currently best SACLOS SPAA in the game (12 ready-to-fire missiles, multi targeting system). Let’s not even talk about the next 12.7 Pantsir, this will end top tier experience pure and simple ;
- Tiger helicopters still at 12.7, why ? 8 FnF missiles VS 16 for other helis, 7-8 km max range VS 16/25 km max range for other helis, no IRCM, climb slower than other helis, HAC and UHT don’t even have a cannon ;
- 75% of small maps, advantaging russian MBTs because they rush you in corners
- To shoot at russian MBTs, gotta go pixelhunting. Urban debris on the ground ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT does zigzags ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT has bushes all over UFP ? Good luck shooting at driver’s port/breach (especially when you have the blur motion on, and that those bushes will “melt” with the tank’s armor in a blurry weird way). You shoot at russian MBTs from far away ? Good luck, gotta go pixel hunting. NATO MBTs in comparaison ? You point, click and shoot. Simple, easy.
- Russian MBTs don’t need to have the best pen, because NATO MBT armors are paper. They have basically the same speed going forward. They now have basically the same reload speed as well (6.4sec reload = +/- the 6sec reload some NATO MBTs have). They of course have so much armor that even top NATO darts can’t frontaly pen.
- IFVs : russians have IFVs with much higher fire rate, laser accuracy, 2 cannons (1 main for HE/ATGMs, 1 autocannon), much faster than some wheeled NATO IFVs. NATO IFVs in comparaison ? Bushmaster, completely garbage.
- Yak-9k, completely broken.
- Been playing some 7.3 US recently. Noticed something. Russian heavy/medium tanks, and some of their tank destroyer, are almost unpenable, IF YOU PLAY A NATO HEAVY TANK AGAINST THEM. IS-3 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that turret neck. IS-4M ? Same, but the spot is even tinier (gotta love bouncing on its side with a 224mm pen shell too). T-10M ? Don’t even think you can pen that. Object 268 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that driver’s port. T-54/55 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that tiny cupola, berely visible). Hell, even some of their T-34/44 will bounce if their turret is angled weirdly. NATO heavy/medium tanks in comparaison ? Multiple weakspots, side will not bounce against a shell (even against russian SPAAs lmao), if you turn your turret a little bit, you’re done.
- T-series MBTs have IRST + HE + Proxy HE + ATGM shells. Some NATO MBTs don’t even have any of that.
- Sweedish IFVs still don’t have IRST
So many more things could be said. NATO SPAAs don’t have cannons. Russia has literally 10 MBTS/IFVs they can use at top tier, worning out NATO forces because they don’t have as many => which leads to constant losses against Russia at top tier GRB. Russia has that 1 ship that doesn’t even exist. KH 38s don’t exist too as well. In the main trailer, it’s the russian MBT that wins against the Abrams. When the AH-64 launches missiles against the russian MBT, we can’t see if the tank exploded or not, because they cut the scene. A lot, lot more.
1 Like
fine.
the overwhelming majority of german mains are trash beyond all belief
It’s the same statement, but said a different way
lol not really. nations are played by all. Its what the nation offers thats attracting certain people
And yet China is primarly played by chinese people, by patriotism I’m guessing. As well as Russia is mainly played my russian people, for the same reason (but also for the bias, of course).
ah yes the wundewaffe nation. Who lost, to the technological superiority of the British and Americans and industrial superiority of the United States.
Bro I’m french not german, you do understand I’m not there to defend german people right ? Quite the opposite, if you think about it
The overwhelming majority of all major mains are trash beyond believe. Its the burden of popularity. Theres a reason why the median KD is 0.75