And im saying that as a US main
U can use the fv4005 or the m109, they somehow also kill the bmpt with a one shot lol xD
no.
saying that this exact nation is baised and make a whole personality about it is straight dishonesty to the players and the game itself.
other nation also got ultra powerfull premium vehicules but you ignore them simple because your baised.
2 Likes
fine.
the overwhelming majority of german mains are trash beyond all belief
lol not really. nations are played by all. Its what the nation offers thats attracting certain people
ah yes the wundewaffe nation. Who lost, to the technological superiority of the British and Americans and industrial superiority of the United States.
1 Like
ITT: ppl compete to have the worst takes on vehicles they haven’t played
saying that this exact nation is baised […] is straight dishonesty
Ok so as a reminder of why russian bias exists (non-exhaustive list) :
- Spikes/MMPs are broken (gotta love hitting commander MG 2 times in a row, a cannon then 6 ERAs eating the ATGM) ;
- NATO MBT armors being paper compared to reality and russian MBTs ingame ;
- NATO MBTs getting nerfed to the ground (turret basket and electronics everywhere now, except the Arietes I think. We’re still waiting for t-series basket, maybe in 8 years we don’t know) ;
- NATO MBTs not getting their best DART (Leos, Leclercs)
- T-series model are broken (ERAs and autoloaders eat DARTs ( Russian Bias in 2026? - #1603 by SnuggyNyx , unbelievable), ERAs eat ATGMs, the whole model eat bombs ( Stalinium armor? - #684 by TROOPER7 : what is THIS seriously ??!)
- LMURs top down approach are correctly modeled, as well as their damage model => AH-64E AGMs are completely BROKEN compared to these, you usually need 2-4 missiles to destroy MBTs/SPAAs/BMPTs
- BMPTs are broken, no need to develop here
- Pantsir-S1 currently best SACLOS SPAA in the game (12 ready-to-fire missiles, multi targeting system). Let’s not even talk about the next 12.7 Pantsir, this will end top tier experience pure and simple ;
- Tiger helicopters still at 12.7, why ? 8 FnF missiles VS 16 for other helis, 7-8 km max range VS 16/25 km max range for other helis, no IRCM, climb slower than other helis, HAC and UHT don’t even have a cannon ;
- 75% of small maps, advantaging russian MBTs because they rush you in corners
- To shoot at russian MBTs, gotta go pixelhunting. Urban debris on the ground ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT does zigzags ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT has bushes all over UFP ? Good luck shooting at driver’s port/breach (especially when you have the blur motion on, and that those bushes will “melt” with the tank’s armor in a blurry weird way). You shoot at russian MBTs from far away ? Good luck, gotta go pixel hunting. NATO MBTs in comparaison ? You point, click and shoot. Simple, easy.
- Russian MBTs don’t need to have the best pen, because NATO MBT armors are paper. They have basically the same speed going forward. They now have basically the same reload speed as well (6.4sec reload = +/- the 6sec reload some NATO MBTs have). They of course have so much armor that even top NATO darts can’t frontaly pen.
- IFVs : russians have IFVs with much higher fire rate, laser accuracy, 2 cannons (1 main for HE/ATGMs, 1 autocannon), much faster than some wheeled NATO IFVs. NATO IFVs in comparaison ? Bushmaster, completely garbage.
- Yak-9k, completely broken.
- Been playing some 7.3 US recently. Noticed something. Russian heavy/medium tanks, and some of their tank destroyer, are almost unpenable, IF YOU PLAY A NATO HEAVY TANK AGAINST THEM. IS-3 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that turret neck. IS-4M ? Same, but the spot is even tinier (gotta love bouncing on its side with a 224mm pen shell too). T-10M ? Don’t even think you can pen that. Object 268 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that driver’s port. T-54/55 ? Gotta go pixel hunting in that tiny cupola, berely visible). Hell, even some of their T-34/44 will bounce if their turret is angled weirdly. NATO heavy/medium tanks in comparaison ? Multiple weakspots, side will not bounce against a shell (even against russian SPAAs lmao), if you turn your turret a little bit, you’re done.
- T-series MBTs have IRST + HE + Proxy HE + ATGM shells. Some NATO MBTs don’t even have any of that.
- Sweedish IFVs still don’t have IRST
So many more things could be said. NATO SPAAs don’t have cannons. Russia has literally 10 MBTS/IFVs they can use at top tier, worning out NATO forces because they don’t have as many => which leads to constant losses against Russia at top tier GRB. Russia has that 1 ship that doesn’t even exist. KH 38s don’t exist too as well. In the main trailer, it’s the russian MBT that wins against the Abrams. When the AH-64 launches missiles against the russian MBT, we can’t see if the tank exploded or not, because they cut the scene. A lot, lot more.
1 Like
fine.
the overwhelming majority of german mains are trash beyond all belief
It’s the same statement, but said a different way
lol not really. nations are played by all. Its what the nation offers thats attracting certain people
And yet China is primarly played by chinese people, by patriotism I’m guessing. As well as Russia is mainly played my russian people, for the same reason (but also for the bias, of course).
ah yes the wundewaffe nation. Who lost, to the technological superiority of the British and Americans and industrial superiority of the United States.
Bro I’m french not german, you do understand I’m not there to defend german people right ? Quite the opposite, if you think about it
The overwhelming majority of all major mains are trash beyond believe. Its the burden of popularity. Theres a reason why the median KD is 0.75
manual control of a atgm for ir guided munition are not in game, it will hit random spot.
just think for a sec
cant get exact number if the tank armor is classified.
every tank got them, if we got by facts, russia is the only country that had a turret basket + autoloader since many years now.
not so smart to think that a 1100mm era / armor canot stop a 900mm pen spikes. you just trolling lmao
GOOD JOB, now you know the difference btw a 5kg tnt and a 19.2 kg tnt.
ah yes the perfect excuse like every map is a flat map.
something called cover when you do cas, see pantsir ? go behinde a mountain.
think, think for a sec.
they are at a lower br for this reason, and they also got a buff who now have 12 missile rather then 8
you never played a T tank and you complain comes from guesses, all maps have differente advantage, nato doesnt have that problem since they dont need maps to get a good depression. they have it all the time. they dont care about the maps.
yet again a stupid argument
lying, literlly lying.
70% of blue side nato have a 4 / 5 / 6 sec reload with the 650mm round.
shut up
crying ? russian doesnt get heat round at these br. nato does.
skill issue 100%
ok and ? atgm are never used, proxy he are also present in other nato tanks.
some tank have stuff, some other doesnt. you cant add this because they dont exist irl.
irst mean a higher br, sweden player dont want half of the light tank goes up in br.
also why in the hell you want a irst when you have the same ifv with a radar mounted. and more ammo.
god damn
manual control of a atgm for ir guided munition are not in game, it will hit random spot. just think for a sec
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8nP8cqhRUjI
As shown here, Spike does hit random spots /s
cant get exact number if the tank armor is classified.
Nothing is “classified” concerning russian MBTs, but everything is “classified” concerning NATO MBTs. How convenient (cope).
every tank got them, if we got by facts, russia is the only country that had a turret basket + autoloader since many years now.
Russian MBTs has turret basket now ? We learn things everyday
not so smart to think that a 1100mm era / armor canot stop a 900mm pen spikes. you just trolling lmao
Tandem charge is a type of military charge designed to puncture armored vehicles protected by explosive reactive armor.
Never heard of tandem charge missiles ? They’re actually made to pen that kind of era. It says it right there, top left of your second screenshot mate.
GOOD JOB, now you know the difference btw a 5kg tnt and a 19.2 kg tnt.
Sure, a 5kg tnt missile can’t destroy a russian MBT with a singular top approach hit.
Spoiler
They actually don’t, because AH-64E AGMs top approach is broken compared to LMURs, that’s the whole point of the sentence my man.
ah yes the perfect excuse like every map is a flat map.
something called cover when you do cas, see pantsir ? go behinde a mountain.
Irrelevant, Pantsir is still the best SACLOS SPAA out there, compared to others. Your point being ?
think, think for a sec.
they are at a lower br for this reason, and they also got a buff who now have 12 missile rather then 8
12.7 not enough, gotta be 12.3/12.0. Currently still waiting for the “buff”.
you never played a T tank and you complain comes from guesses, all maps have differente advantage, nato doesnt have that problem since they dont need maps to get a good depression. they have it all the time. they dont care about the maps.
yet again a stupid argument
Ad hominem now huh ? Good argument there, for sure.
lying, literlly lying.
70% of blue side nato have a 4 / 5 / 6 sec reload with the 650mm round.
shut up
T-80u fighting MSC, 6sec reload each ? T80 bvm fighting Leos, 6 sec reload each ? Your point being ?
Starting to loose your temper and insult ? Good one
crying ? russian doesnt get heat round at these br. nato does.
skill issue 100%
T-32 and other heavies at that BR get heat rounds ? Please show me ??
ok and ? atgm are never used, proxy he are also present in other nato tanks.
some tank have stuff, some other doesnt. you cant add this because they dont exist irl.
Leos/Abrams/Leclercs don’t have irst, though they do have it irl
Leclercs don’t have proxy he ingame, though they do have it irl, and that’s why it’s added up to the game next update (after years)
Double standard here ? We give everything in the first place to russian vehicles, then we give them to NATO years after that ? Maybe we’ll wait additionnal years for the real NATO armors to be added ?
irst mean a higher br, sweden player dont want half of the light tank goes up in br.
Selective realism, they do have irst irl but not added ingame ? You know what sweedish players want or don’t want know ?
also why in the hell you want a irst when you have the same ifv with a radar mounted. and more ammo.
Maybe to get multiple of them in the lineup ? And actually get a useable laser guided atgm IFV (strf 9040 BILL) instead of the crappy spike one ?
Not a great defense here, not a great defense overall throughout your entire post as a mater of fact, ngl pal.
1 Like
wheeled, 3 person crew and no STAB.
It actually has a reload unlike many of the light tank autocannons.
8.0 is a reach.
such as
I mean if you’re asking for my personal favourite
Said APCBC actually has more pen than the ZTS63s APFSDS btw
“M392A3 is better than M728” has crept into this thread somewhere I just can’t be bothered to find it
you ever interacted with a chinese playerbase in any game?
explains a fair bit.
1 Like
im grinding america right now. I know… 60% of my matches im carrying harder than when im playing britain. Facing your home trees stuff is scary, you know what they can do and what it does to your tank.
Very aware of that. Even BR defining tanks like tigers and hellcats cant even push a K/D of 1 from it
thats just flanker, he’s like that
there’s so many layers to how awful that take is
instead of picking something like the ZTZ96 or AFT09 he picks two of the most rancid vehicles in the Chinese tree
Indeed it did! How could you tell? :-)
It’s well documented across the entire 1.0-13.0 BR range that they are worse than US or RU players, let alone minor nation ones.