USSR tech-tree, where are the other post USSR nations?

That is an impossibility.

I mean NK and Iran are both right there, maybe some states like Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as they still actively cooperate.

But I believe the Baltics and Ukraine both have better places to be.

Putting western stuff in the USSR tree would only exemplify the problem and from what India and Romania is being treated like, original vehicles would mostly be relegated to event/premium fodder.

Already an event vehicle for Germany, seems unlikely

1 Like

It would make more sense to ask for vehicles like the T-72M4CZ/M-84 instead of continuing to turn tech trees into sludge by adding western designs into USSR/Russia.

6 Likes

It makes the most sense.

In my opinion, at the moment USSR should not have a sub-tech tree of any kind, if I could choose, a proper light tank line or at least best vehicles in this area in the tech tree should do the work.

Far from what I know, Leopards were made in West Germany, there are three T-72s outside the USSR tech tree, for instance there are seven Leopard 2s outside Germany tech tree.

Considering that an European tech tree is far from just an idea, should be enough to house other nations that are not in-game, either being eastern european or western european instead of cutting everything in small pieces in different tech trees.

Take the “United Nations” tech tree in World of Tanks as example:

2 Likes

I think its more stuff like the Strela and OSA slapped everywhere. You’ve also had the Mig-21 for Britain and now you have the Mig-29 for Italy as premiums. Im dreading that we’ll get something soviet instead of the Skysabre next major

1 Like

I think none of all parties are really satisfied with the most recent additions to the game to be honest.

1 Like

Yeah… Im kinda happy about naval, but the last few updates for air and ground have been unfortunately very disappointing.

1 Like

I wonder why lithuania would join NATO and buy western equipment moment they werent in soviet union anymore, and not just orient themselves to Russia if they are such great friends.

2 Likes

So basically the Israeli tech tree for WoT.

From my pov adding minor and (no offense) absolute irrelevant nations play no role if they don’t justify the implementation cost by offering a large amount of people willing to play the game - and even more important willing to spend money.

As long as wt is trapped in their habit to add nations solely on their potential if they have high end / top tier hardware which can be sold for insane prices it seems futile to discuss additions of new TTs by bundling minor nations.

This discussion about ex WP / now Nata countries play no role as long as gaijin is unable or unwilling to create Nato vs WP (and now the RF) lobbies and would reflect that nations would be allocated to one of those sides at certain periods (like up to 1991 and after joining Nato) - which is currently impossible as introduction / service time plays no role in the BR setting process and the MM is creating pure fantasy lobbies.

Imho “real” regional powers like Turkey, Indonesia or India have way higher chances to get own trees as they have a large player potential - in total opposition to the nations discussed here.

Kinda reminds me of the pan europe tree in world of warships.
https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Ships_of_Europe

That’s not important. No ex-Soviet nation wants to be in the same space as the USSR/Russia. And most of all, gaijin don’t like it when people talk about them negatively on the internet. Especially when it comes to politics.

nooooooooo ussr cant have vehicles from soviet nations only we can have them!!!11!!!1!!!

Yes, what’s wrong?

Literally 1 message after he states his disapproval of the soviet tech in the western trees

Also quite good chunk of modern equipment of former soviet/Warsaw pact nations modern equipment have little to nothing to do with the USSR or if it was a upgraded soviet vehicle, done mostly by the operating country and it’s domestic and/or western components.

E.G Czech F-35 has no soviet components and is replacing gripens, the only link is prior (forced) cooperation between Czechoslovakia and USSR on other vehicles (neither of the two nations exist anymore). Lithuanian Leopard 2s are the first tanks for the country post independence. The VAB mk.3 SICH is a French vehicle upgraded by a Ukrainian combat module. The Latvian Scimitar is equipped with a SPIKE Atgm and again, no soviet components.

Finally, two wrongs don’t make a right.

1 Like

When has this game ever been political? Nothing like this will ever be a issue.

Yes, it’s funny to think that way.

I don’t understand, what’s funny about it? It’s a historical precedent not a political one.