None of these are 10.3 you claimed tho.
Its ability to bomb all bases and airfield caused it. Three B-29s meant game over.
One might say that is evidence that their metrics are flawed or there is an insufficiently sophisticated analysis that determines their balancing equations.
Which meant their earnings were high from bombing, which is what they balance.
None of these are 10.3 you claimed tho.
Game is about lineups.
1 Like
Okay… 10.3’s strongest lineup is Sweden.
2nd is Italy.
3rd is Britain.
Then Soviets.
Soviets tech tree 10.3 is mid. T-72AV makes it good; Also it’s 4 tech tree vehicles. 2 premiums. And an Su-22M3 for CAS.
T-64B is 9.7, not 10.3.
Same with Khriz.
That’s like including Strv 105 in a 10.3 lineup…
1 Like
I mean clearly, they just take numbers at face value and make adjustments based on it, there is no consideration for anything else.
You will never use more than 6 vehicles in game tho. Cause with 6 in lineup you have 12 spawns with backups. In my 35k games i never saw anyone spawn more than 10 times in course of single GRB game.
Having options is an advantage as well, and not having to use backups as those are a finite resource.
T-80B and Strela are.
Moderna and 292 also.
4 vehicles isn’t the best lineup I’ve ever seen.
MiG-21SMT and MiG-21bis too, not like there’s good reason to take either.
Su-22M3 and MiG-23M.
US has nice 10.3
KVT
M1
LOSAT
XM975
OH-58D
A-10A early
A-7D
F-5A
F-5C
Then just add the 10.0 stuff and you’re good.
If their vehicles are incredibly easy to use and handheld etc etc why do you have essentially the same K/D in your by your claims handheld premium turms as basically any other german tank at and around the same BR? (1K/D).
2 Likes
At least it has APFSDS. It may not be the best, but it doesn’t shatter or have ADPS’s weirdness. It’s angled performance is pretty shitty true. You also didn’t mention the HEAT, APDS, APHE and missile. Now, they’re hugely situational of course, but they’re extra options which boosts the tanks rating.
It’s worse than Chieftain’s APDS round.
That is your opinion. The ADPS still shatters sometimes although the post-penetration damage is pretty decent (as it should be with that size of round penetrating, lol)
Bagged ERA is based on NATO documents, if you have an issue with their protection, have fun refuting NATO.
Perhaps the raw numbers are “correct”, I have zero interest in digging it out, however it most certainly stops rounds it shouldn’t in circumstances it shouldn’t.
Now, a lot of this could be down to the dodgy damage system. I’m sure we’ve all experienced weirdness. Hell, I non-penned the side of a BTR the other day with a 120mm APDS round. Shit happens, but shit seems to happen more often with that ERA. I suspect this is largely down to quality control at gaijin, not anything nefarious though.
T-series UFP is only over-performing flat [which you won’t fire at it unless you’re directly above it and don’t slide down somehow], it’s performing correctly at its default angle you shoot them at.
That is your opinion. I saw the analysis and it was pretty convincing to me.
RE the L27A1 round, you are right, it can penetrate the UFP of the T-90A after the ERA has been removed. Perhaps it wouldn’t be an issue if the L27A1 had it’s anti-era tip modelled but we don’t so c’est la vie.
1 Like
Genuinely embarassing to have same stats in US/German kit as Soviet.
The US/German kit is a platinum spoon and the Soviet kit is a takeaway fork.
Backups aint finite,i currently sit at 3k of them while not buying any for GE and using them regularly. Just need to know your ways to get em.
Is that way playing the game for 10 years and playing tens of thousands of matches?
1 Like
If you want to discuss in-game balance - please use the already created, pinned thread.
If you want to discuss specific in-game nations and their vehicles - please use the Machinery of War section.
If you want to insult other players/other nations/anyone - please remove yourself from our forum or I will do it for you.
11 Likes