Why are the maps not more developed? I just counted the grid and how many squares we are actually playing in and have the objectives and what not it’s 4 of 81…
4 is approximately 4.94% of 81
We aren’t even using 5% of the map? Can you add more objectives and things?
6 Likes
from what I understand the full maps are only formatted to support air battles, only the small portions that ground battles are actually fought on are fully developed to support ground units.
Don’t ask me how that works, it’s way over my head, it’s just apparently what one of the SIM Devs said about adding more playable vehicle types to SIM EC modes
They can, they just don’t want to give us more airfields/spread out targets since it takes effort and increases match length, which in turn increases rewards. They already kinda do this with the EC maps at high tier, but those don’t do a good job at spreading players out because they do not spawn players far apart/
5 Likes
Well it seems that is just how the majority is
3 Likes
That’s not something that’s static, though. Players can and have adapted and learned; after all, nobody complains about the map sizes and mission possibilities in ARMA III
No, it is how the CoD kids are. Nobody complained about the sniping spot in areas like on Sand of Sinai, but Gaijin still removed it, made you blow up if you even looked in the direction, and now the C point is just more CQC that nobody asked for.
2 Likes
They’re not wrong though, are they?
Oh come on, I know you know better than that smhh
See how quickly people adapted to Nuclear Thunder? See how popular it was? The people HUNGER for tactics and proper role-based play! Human - player - nature is malleable, it’s about harnessing that malleability to make a better game and better gameplay, and a healthier community too.
1 Like
I’ve played 5 matches in the last 3 days which were 3-4 minutes long R-AB 10.3’s I’m sorry the matches are too long?
Yeah, a lot of maps go heavily under utelised. Falklands is a good example, rather than having the airspawns in a diaganol corner, they are over the island, totally negating the supposedly “larger” size of the map
1 Like
What I want? This isn’t about me little dude it’s about everyone. What I think is we should use more than 4-6 squares out of 81. Does it need to be all 81? No but 20 or 30 sure then we are at least using 25-33% of the map.
No, they are way too short right now.
I want longer matches.
1 Like
The problem is that if they expand but there’s nothing in that expansion, it’s not worth it.
Then with only 3 modes, what do you expect? But one thing they could do is remove the planes from the small maps.
What? “The problem is that if they expand there is nothing in the expansion?” wtf is that supposed to even mean? I don’t know if you’re a small child or whats going on here but you need to ask mommy before you go talking to grown ups on the internet.
Thanks for the insult, and I accept it. That said, if you consider the land maps small, i.e., a large 180m2 5x5 block map, and you expand it, and in the expansion there are no structures, trees, rocks, etc., expanding that 5% is useless, and in fact I would call it harmful.
But who am I to argue with His Majesty and oppose me? My reasoning is that of someone who loves playing with land units, mostly helicopters. I’m not crazy about planes, but if the realistic air modes give you the option of carrying anti-aircraft guns like samp/t or similar, I’ll think about it.
That said, bye, handsome.
1 Like
I don’t think that increases anything. It’s 100% out of their control on how long a match is… Other than how long that timer for the match is which is like 30 minutes? I’ve been in matches which are 3 minutes and ive been in matches which are 30 minutes Gaijin didn’t have anything to do with it. It’s the players and how they want to play. Every just sit in a game and you and the last 4 players just do bombing runs till the game ends? why kill each other we are getting our points and money just fine. If everyone wanted to do this what would gaijin do? What could they do? This is how people want to play and there is no rule saying you can’t. So thats a poor argument imo. The players decide how they want to play not Gaijin. I have never received a message from gaijin once saying hey you can’t play like that, and i’m 100% sure you haven’t either.
There isn’t enough stuff to blow up and that is boring… 4 bases to bomb? 10 little groups of dudes on the ground? There are like 20 strike-craft in the match… I played a game yesterday where 8 of the 14 people on my team were A-10A’s and that’s not including the other strike-craft in the match. We are already fighting for scraps here I can’t see there being a problem with adding more stuff to blow up.
They should put the simulator maps in realistic that would make the game way better. There is so much going on in simulator mode it’s absolutely crazy the rest of the game isn’t like that. It’s like here is the game fully unlocked but you have to play with bad controls… Why not just let me play with realistic controls? That is the part that doesn’t make sense to me. That just seems small brain
Was that aggression really necessary? (no)