taking the context of the last few posts here…
Today (or yesterday) i come across this dude thinking they are the king of leos on chat. Cheking his profile and i come across this:
insane amount of games, BUT, lower than 1 KD on US! If ppl really think dont have a problem on leos on this game, idk man, this tanks really compensates for the lack of skill
@edit:
Not really lower than 1, but almost 1KD flat (my bad)
All I know is…
I have a positive K/D on each and every single one of my Rank VII-VIII MBTs (I have all of them except Italy and China)…
…except for FIVE:
Challenger 2 TES (barely, I could fix it in 3 matches, but I haven’t played it in over a year)
Challenger 2 (barely too, could fix it in like 50 matches)
And…
M1A2 SEP
M1A1 AIM
M1A2
I have positive K/D on the other Challengers (Black Night, 3 (TD), 2 (2F))
I have a positive K/D on the Type 10s
I have a positive K/D on the Type 90s
I have positive K/D on the Leclercs
I have a positive K/D on the Russian MBTs
I have a positive K/D on the MERKAVA MK.4s…
Yet I could not achieve it on most of the Abrams tanks and in two of the worst variants of one of the technically weakest MBTs in the game.
How is it possible that I somehow do better on Merkava Mk.4s than I do on the Abrams, if the Abrams is so good?
His kd with the leos isnt really much higher tho aside from the 2a7 which is 1.5 they are around 1.0 or 1.1
after the events on the other day i take my time to inspect france and japan tanks (i didnt really did it before) and…
Wow, better lower plate protection…
Idk how ppl come here to type that abrams have better armor… But who knows, maybe im playing another game…
On abrams KD, im manage to get 1<KD on abrams 11.3, get a nuke yesterday (prof bc i know its insane: https://i.imgur.com/onvYyDg.jpeg)
maybe isnt much higher, but compare ~1.5KD and 1KD with the dif more than 6K games… good luck change any number there
still 1.5 isnt really much higher either, specially when he has 10 k matches with the previous leopards
Let’s just compare the Abrams vs the (underperforming) TKX against one of their main opponents, 3BM60:
Even in spite of the underperforming inner cheeks (wtf are those holes), I unironically prefer Type 10 over the Abrams.
At least its hull armor is functional against 3BM60 and anything lower than that (and even better shells at some angles and ranges), while the Abrams is lolpenned by DM33.
And leaving armor aside, it’s smaller, it’s faster, it’s autoloaded and has the fastest reload in Top Tier, at 4 seconds.
So again, let’s compare my performance on Type 10 vs the Abrams: oh, what a surprise. Much better, again. Why could it possibly be?
1.52 vs 0.97 K/D… yeah, I get I am not great, but I think the fact that, as an average player, I do better on most Top Tier MBTs than I do on the Abrams should tell something.
you know that to he manage to have 1KD on leo 2A7V he have to die ~3800time WITHOUT kill ANYONE right?
The more sample you have, the more exact value you have.
Those values is almost written on rocks dude…
Can you get the same test with M829A1? Bc i shot the ring turret on TKK today and it got gaijined…
I know i play 11.3, dont get M829A2 and etc… But i still think the problem is the same ± (just a little less on M1A2)…
dude no matter how you look at it he didnt do much better with the 2a7v a .5 kd difference is not large, not to mention that YOU talked about the “leos” not the specific 2a7v and with those he does nearly the same with them.
Same as 3BM60!
Type 10/TKX’s armor is just very trolly, hahah. Inconsistent, but trolly.
I have good experience with 2A4, thats why i typed that way, I just put it together. And 0.5KD difference on 6K games is really big dude…
its the same as someone coming here and saying that they have 15KD on M1A1 bc the had ONE game and kill 15.
it is not, is just killing an extra guy every other game
its the same as someone coming here and saying that they have 15KD on M1A1 bc the had ONE game with it and kill 15.
Again, the amount of sample you have, the more certain you have of something. And not even me saying, its the mathematics lol
Wanna see something even funnier?
The Merkava Mk.4s are often regarded as some of the worst MBTs in Top Tier, particularly due to their severely underperforming armor.
Welp…
I do better on the Merkavas than I do on the Abrams BUNUJAHUAHUAJAJAJA
1.15 (and rising ever since I spaded it) vs 0.97
The WR is on the low side compared to my other MBTs because Israel keeps getting matched with U.S, though.
I also perform better on the CHALLENGER 2s (except for basic 2 and TES), also regarded as some of the worst MBTs, than I do on the Abrams:
If someone can explain to me why I can do better on Challengers or Merkavas compared to the Abrams when the Abrams is suppossed to be so great… I’m all for it.
Idk what to say to you dude, i dont really have the experience on japan, the only thing i did is the protection analysis.
But what im saying there on my response is the amount of samples vs certain of result. on that dude you can certain that he play BETTER on GER than US…
US players need to bring this, and not faceplant so much.
There are still improvements to be made to the Abrams.
I’m going to talk about my experience vs the Challenger 2s (which will be the same experience as the noobs that buy the click-bait).
Any challenger 2 11.3 vs US 11.3:
Any US 11.3 vs challenger 2:
WOW, pretty much the same thing, no?
So abrams shit as challenger i guess (I know it’s not the best parallel, but it seems to make sense)
