USA bullying of everyone else In top tier sim

Splendid news.

The Eurofighter is a better overall plane (in war thunder) I don’t think there’s any real debate to be held there. MICA missiles are just better close engagement missle than the available ordinance for typhoons for now though, ASRAAM and meteor would change that though. Those missiles would just be unfair though as no other plane would be viable

Russia is still lacking.

Crazy to think the Su-33 is a 13.3 as well…

I can’t see a reason why the Su-34 is at 13.3 either.
Plus, wtf is up with the sun visor gaijin??

1 Like

not much that can be done there now. the most powerful fighters ever built are now in the game so russian kit wont ever be on par without everyone else being borked. Rafale and Typhoon shouldn’t have been added yet its almost certainly done irreparable damage to METAs

1 Like

Well, not really. If you look at my earlier posts, I came across documents proving:

Mig-29s engine’s are under preforming, then turn rate is under preforming for the Su’s and the migs.

The R-77 should have better performance than it does in game.

1 Like

Su-27 flight model is still underperforming and a Flanker flight model with good radar would be perfectly viable in current meta. Even old Flanker is a lot better with the energy retention buff.

2 Likes

Odd how USA mains don’t like playing the game when they are the ones outnumbered and have to fight things with better flight performance than they have.

5 Likes

… still not in the game.

Their’s may be, but the are not.

Suddenly, all skilled US players magically disappear.

1 Like

That’s opinion from the two of you lol

That’s why nations are scrambling to build 5th and 6th gen planes, because a 4th gen is the most powerful.

Sure lol

1 Like

It’s because they’re the only allowed bullies. Otherwise they’re suffering. And clearly USA equipment never suffers.

bro nato is ahead of russia by 50 - 100 years, china is even worse than russian planes no matter how much I.P they steal. This isnt a opinion this is a fact.

This is an egregious statement, 50-100 years is pure insanity, and is also totally false. 50 years ago was 1974 (1975 in a few days), you really think an F-15A or F-14A is gonna be on equal footing with a modernized flanker?

3 Likes

how is it under performing

did you… not understand what i typed?

Oof you took his bait, bad idea

1 Like

If we are ahead of Russia and China by 50 to 100 years, then back in 1974, since we were ahead of Russia by 50-100 years, the F-15A (my favorite jet btw so don’t even try to go down the ivan route) and F-14A should be able to combat modernized flankers like J-16 and Su-30SM2 effectively by YOUR logic

3 Likes

my guy i never said anything about us being ahead of russian by 50 years in 1974… im talking about now. Nato is far ahead of russia

It underperforms in terms of specific excess power especially at lower speeds.

3 Likes

Still, not by 50-100 years, that is pure delusion. Especially with 2 6th gen Chinese prototypes, that we know of, currently in flying condition, the gap isn’t nearly that big

3 Likes