yes dcs has been use to correct gaijin in it happened with the phantom when they thought it couldtmany of there… errors with planes on this game. It happened with the zuni rockets when gaijin employes didn’t think that zunis could fire at their current speed.
if the AIM 7F hit you and didnt just magically not want to hit / track. It got to the point where everytime i fired the aim 7f i was like " i wonder how its going to miss this time "
sleep walk a win? :D there is no sleep walking a win bombing bases and air field in sim requires time practice and fortitude.
uh what? no one has ever thought that , when gaijin announced the BR of the F4 Ice everyone was like " a phantom fighting 4th gen? at that BR? No way gaijin is doing this.
we are not goig to let other nations get our planes, and then be in older variants or models of the same plane with inferior engines or weapons if any of you think this, then you are Out of your F* mind. Warthunder has never been balanced, and when you try to force us to fly inferior planes because you seem to have some weird hate for " US mains " and think that we are going to be silent, you can go kick rocks, or make BIG ROCKS into little rocks.
i mean… this does actually happen… in arcade i can meet 4.3 planes in the 50mm ME 262 or 5.3s in the F84 the amount of rage someoe has when they are trying to camp spawns in arcade in a K4 or TA, thinking they are untochable just for the to realize im actually at 33,000 ft diving on them is always funny.
i agree with this statement, its just harder to do on some maps.
ehh you’re both right and both wrong… i find spawn camping distasteful and just stupid
always good to know people seems to do this in aim sim none stop.
it is i’ve been lockers by opFOR planes a total of 20 times spawning in both air sim and ground sim. all red does is spawn camp, and its even worse in ground sim because they also have pantsir and tor m1s
This is why we win, and can dodge your missiles without chaff. This isnt a simple RWR we know how close your missiles are, and when to use Afterburners and when not to.
When i say the U.S Has better planes / tech / electronics, i mean it for a reason, its like a inferior Tactical Situational Display.
This has nothing to do with tws. You are launching in STT and then unlocking and then engaging STT again. This is not a strong gimmick in SB when you take into consideration how absolutely abysmal the Su-27 radar is and that you will also be trying to defend from AMRAAM at the same time.
Anyways what about that 1v1? Surely your gunfighting prowess will be illuminating.
You can choose to use TWS to keep a visual on the target instead of just waiting or using the missile camera.
Don’t care, was stated to be impossible by those before me, I did not come here to prove the efficacy of the tactic.
So is it just a gunfight now or otherwise, I’ve already said that I’m fine with either a live match with other players or a curated dogfight, I’m fine with either.
Well considering you basically have played sim 3 times in the past 2 months I figured a pure 1v1 would be more in your favor. And that removes the problems of team composition and aircraft capabilities.
And I’ve played barely any matches in general in recent history bar grinding the AGM-130s because I have interest in games other than WT as of now.
Currently I’m only in game to take test drive videos, I don’t have interest in flying out right now to grind or otherwise.
I see that you cannot scroll, here you are.
Indeed, and that is why TWS makes it easier to pull off as the target is kept on the HUD and you can easier gauge the range at which your missile currently is based upon time of flight.
If your experience was beyond just fiddling around in test flight you would realize that your tactic would not be all that effective in a real match due to the limitations of the radar.
Yes and from the start of December I’ve played less than 70 RB games, its almost like I have little interest in actually playing WT as of late. Shocking I know.
And yet it is possible to pull off in either TWS or SRC, as I have already proven, which was my only goal. So far people here are grasping at straws trying to move the argument away from it not being possible to now being not a valid tactic.
This is a thing currently and is not just a glitch that persisted 3 weeks after the introduction of the Mig-29 and its R-27s.