Yep, 12.3 sounds better, because not even 11.0 should see these. IRCCM should be STRICTLY top tier.
2 Likes
The radar doesn’t tell you what kind of plane you are acquiring and the radar will also ping my RWR which tells me what kind of plane is scanning me and roughly how far away it is. Also most radars at this tier are not very good.
If I am flying A-10C in air to air role…then you won’t have those context clues. You won’t know that I am at the ground battle because I won’t be attacking it. You have to sort out my black dot from amongst the other black dots that you can see…and then correctly identify me from 3-5km away.
The issue isn’t that the A-10C can defend itself. The issue is that it is the best fighter for its BR in practice. It has all of the tools to defend itself at a higher tier without ruining the playability of planes at the current tier.
Currently it faces things that have a grand total of 6 countermeasures. That is ridiculous.
2 Likes
Lmao not for me. I wish. Although yes they are supposed to, work the same as rb in sb… or maybe I’m just too used to them being bad lol.
Well let’s not forget flares won’t defeat IOG
Not all 10.3-11.3 aircraft have IFF, or good radars even.
Yes, because one A-10 is pretty well balanced, the other one broke a whole BR range.
Lastly, if you turn in any SU, you usually bleed too much speed if your fairly close (kept happening when me vs Unknown got into a lobby) I would be doing about 600 mph, turn and flare to evade the Aim-9m, but he’d hit me with his cannon since I bled so much speed I was doing 400-450 mph, and he was doing 400.
Also, most USA teams are 2v1 USSR, or 3v1 can’t really fight that effectively in a Su
Come to think of it, A-10C is the only aircraft in game currently with the ability to IFF without pinging or notifying the enemy aircrafts RWR. Pretty massive for sim
4 Likes
“Far” “point black”
R-73 irrcm seems to only do good under 0.5 KM unlike the Aim-9m
Exactly ^
If that’s what you believe. At this point I’m just repeating myself.
Because you aren’t proving anything. Show actual repeatable stats
I just showed you multiple clips of the R-73 ignoring flares beyond 0.5km. Not gonna compile 100 short videos to prove a point to someone whos ignorant.
Ah yes I’m ignorant, a clip, you know how many clips I could send to you of the Aim-9ms way over preforming?
And if could I want stats based off some photo you drew. Because that photo isn’t a stat, that’s an opinion.
6.6km Aim-9M shot. He should have pre-flared? Or just needs to stay further away or something.
4 Likes
Uh ok…? Man who ignores proof denies ignorance.
And no I’m not referring to the drawing, that’s just a visualization to how their IRCCM effectiveness works over distance. You trying to perceive that as proof is kinda funny.
Maybe you should do some research on your own. You didn’t even know how the 9M and R-73 worked until people spelled it out for you. So I’m not sure if its a good idea to deny proof when you can’t even read by yourself.
Very nice. I mean nothing he could do prevent death there, he was focused on someone else and you snuck up.
Been playing pretty much the A-10C recently (2/3 to ace crew now) and yeasterday I was greeted with this when I logged in:
Seems like the enemy team(s) did not think A-10C is fair on 11.3
1 Like
When did I ever say I didn’t know how Aim-9ms or R-73s worked? I’ve always known.
Then why post the photo? And you just re-eluded to that photo.
Nor did I agree it was proof. That’s why I said prove they operate the exact way you say, unless of course, your incorrect and talking some non-sense.
^ You trying to explain R-73
^ You for some reason thinking SB changes how R-73 works
^ Delusional take of 9L > R-73
^ lol
I mean every time I post some kind of damning evidence you immediately try to move the goalpost or try to explain otherwise despite not having the data, most notably you trying to explain why my R-73 hit an F-15 3km away even though he was flaring.
Its easier to explain with pictures rather than describing everything.
1 Like
Well
Radar tells you direction and distance(depends)
And bruh, enemy has no radar, enemy flies 350-400 knots, what it can be on US side?
The radar doesn’t tell you the speed that a target is moving at and most of the radars at 11.3 are not pulse doppler.
The RWR on the A-10C is more useful than pretty much any of the actual radars at this tier.
Yeah would be nice if the Fencer got separated BR-wise from the earlier Tornados (MFG/WTD). At the moment on “red” side it’s really very full with Fencers and Tornados, so one has to chase for bases before they get destroyed b others, which is quite annoying.