It isn’t. It isn’t fair for flareless jets to face in the case of A-10As
9M’s don’t have IOG, like I said they’re exact same as 9L but with IRCCM and motor is smokeless.
It has INS, which is essentially the same as IOG.
Source? It doesn’t say anywhere in-game or in datamine spreadsheets. As far as I know only the radar missiles and atgms have IOG as a feature in game.
That’s just the IRCM feature
But it’s still INS, which is just IOG with a different name.
It’s not guided by magic when the seeker is closed.
IOG: The R27ER loses lock but maintains what it believes to be the same course that will intercept the enemy plane at some point either by proxy or by re-lock
INS: The AIM-9M drops lock on purpose when it detects a flare but maintains what it believes to be the same course that will intercept the enemy plane at some point either by proxy or by re-lock.
Are you seeing it now
^ exactly
So is it decided that the A-10C is too good for 11.3? And should be moved to 12.0?
Nope.
It’s perfectly balanced.
Cons: It’s slow.
Pros: Everything else it has is better than anything at its BR.
Not very balanced.
Agreed. But hey if speed is the biggest factor here, the Su-25T should be a 9.7 right?
@UnknownDistance
(I know you were talking sarcastically lol I watched you wipe my whole team one match, and the only person who really could put up a good fight was me until I was getting 2v1’d)
The whole “but it’s slow” argument doesn’t make a whole lot of sense because you can pick and choose any planes that are “slow” but still are the best for their BRs.
Take the JF-17 for example, it’s slower than a lot of other aircraft at its BR but is the best 13.3 fighter.
Ground attackers need to be the best pseudo-fighters at their BR.
This is perfectly logical and anyone that thinks otherwise is just coping.
(A-10C at 11.3 just creates another BR range that is unplayable for USSR mains that aren’t also flying under-tiered ground attackers as pseudo-fighters)
I mean I’d like 4 R-73s too lol
Ragebait
11.7 call it a night.
Shenanigans